Is Conservation of Energy the Key to Solving This Tricky Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between momentum and kinetic energy in the context of a car and the Earth. It highlights that while the momentum change of the car is equal to that of the Earth, the kinetic energy is not the same due to the Earth's significantly larger mass. The formula for kinetic energy (Ek=1/2*m*v^2) is compared with momentum (p=m*v), leading to the conclusion that the kinetic energy gained by the Earth is much lower. This analysis suggests that option c is likely correct based on the calculations presented. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these physical principles in solving related problems.
Tim Wu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
image.jpg

I find this problem kind of tricky. I think it must be a, since a change in momentum of the car causes the same change in momentum of the earth.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tim Wu said:
a change in momentum of the car causes the same change in momentum of the earth
That part is correct. But does that imply that the kinetic energy is the same? Compare the formulas for momentum and kinetic energy.
 
Doc Al said:
That part is correct. But does that imply that the kinetic energy is the same? Compare the formulas for momentum and kinetic energy.
Oh yeah! Ek=1/2*m*v^2, and v = p/m, therefore Ek= p^2/2m. Since p is the same for car and Earth but the Earth's mass is way bigger the kinetic energy gained by Earth wud be much lower! So would option c be right?
 
Tim Wu said:
Oh yeah! Ek=1/2*m*v^2, and v = p/m, therefore Ek= p^2/2m. Since p is the same for car and Earth but the Earth's mass is way bigger the kinetic energy gained by Earth wud be much lower! So would option c be right?
You got it. Good thinking!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top