Is doing quantum mechanics in fourth year normal?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the timing of quantum mechanics and electromagnetism courses in a physics degree program, specifically addressing concerns about the curriculum structure at a particular university compared to others. Participants explore the implications of taking these subjects in the fourth year versus earlier years, considering both educational quality and preparedness for advanced studies.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about their university offering quantum mechanics and electromagnetism in the fourth year, noting that other local universities teach these subjects earlier.
  • Another participant questions what foundational courses are taken in the first three years, suggesting that the curriculum may be atypical.
  • Some participants argue that taking quantum mechanics in the fourth year is not uncommon and that earlier exposure to the material may not be necessary for success.
  • There is a suggestion that the level of courses may vary significantly between institutions, with some participants sharing their own experiences of taking advanced courses earlier in their studies.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of taking these courses later on performance in standardized tests like the GRE.
  • Some participants note that the depth of the courses may differ, implying that a later course could be more rigorous than an earlier one.
  • One participant highlights the variability in teaching approaches, indicating that some universities may prioritize foundational math skills before introducing advanced physics topics.
  • Another participant critiques the curriculum by US standards, suggesting that the program may lack certain upper-division courses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the curriculum structure is adequate or typical. There are multiple competing views regarding the timing and depth of quantum mechanics and electromagnetism courses, with some arguing that later courses can be beneficial while others express concern about preparedness.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various educational standards and practices across different universities and countries, indicating that curriculum structures can vary widely. There is also mention of differing levels of rigor in courses that may affect student preparedness.

Woolyabyss
Messages
142
Reaction score
1
I'll be going into first year of a physics degree in early September and I was looking at the module list and noticed that the university I will be going to does quantum mechanics in fourth year. I've since looked at other universities in the area and noticed that they all seem to do it in third year.
Not only that but electromagnetism is also taught in fourth year which some universities in the area seem to teach in second year or in third year at the very latest. I'm a bit worried now that maybe this physics degree isn't as good as the others.
Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you do in years 1-3?
 
Jorriss said:
What do you do in years 1-3?

In second year: electricity,circuits, magnetism, mechanics,nuclear physics,thermodynamics, astronomy

Third year: computational, thermal, stellar(astro) , electronics and quantum physics

Note: the quantum physics module now that I read the description says it "outlines the formal structure of quantum mechanics".

EDIT there is also maths modules which I can't seem to find.
 
Keep in mind, the information I am going to give is largely second hand, but that seems atypical. Taking quantum mechanics and E&M fourth year is pretty late.

Is the "electricity,circuits, magnetism, " course(s) a lab? Is this not just E&M?

If you could give the name of the university one could give more detailed information.
 
Woolyabyss said:
I'll be going into first year of a physics degree in early September and I was looking at the module list and noticed that the university I will be going to does quantum mechanics in fourth year. I've since looked at other universities in the area and noticed that they all seem to do it in third year.
Not only that but electromagnetism is also taught in fourth year which some universities in the area seem to teach in second year or in third year at the very latest. I'm a bit worried now that maybe this physics degree isn't as good as the others.
Any thoughts?

It's very normal, you should see elementary QM during modern physics (usually at the sophomore level), following this most people do the full fledged QM course sequence in either third or fourth year.
 
I think seeing quantum in fourth year isn't all that uncommon. I am starting fourth year and beginning the quantum module at the level of Grifiths. As others have mentioned, I did have a sophomore class called "modern physics" that gave the historical background and an elementary introduction to quantum mechanics. Several of my friends jumped into the quantum module as a Junior without the proper foundations in classical mechanics, E&M, PDE's, etc and suffered a bit trying to catch up.

I think not seeing upper level E&M until fourth year is less common but not detrimental in any sense. A few people I know deferred E&M until 4th year and have made it through just fine.

Don't base the quality of your program on how soon you get to take classes. Just take it slow and dive in when you're comfortable with the material. Besides, who says you have to follow the suggested 4 year plan?
 
Last edited:
That is strange to me as well. My only question is, wouldn't you be taking the GRE in early fourth year? And how could you be expected to do well without basic E&M/Quantum knowledge?
 
His third year "quantum physics" module probably gives him enough basic QM to do OK on the GRE.
 
Woolyabyss said:
Not only that but electromagnetism is also taught in fourth year which some universities in the area seem to teach in second year or in third year at the very latest. I'm a bit worried now that maybe this physics degree isn't as good as the others.
Any thoughts?
You're probably comparing apples to oranges. I'd be surprised if the electromagnetism taught in the second year is at the same level as the electromagnetism course taught in the fourth year. Typically, in the US, there's an intro physics sequence you take during the first two years of college, and then in your junior and senior years, you take the courses where you cover many of the same topics again at a deeper level.

When I was an undergrad, quantum mechanics was a fourth-year sequence. E&M was split across the end of the junior year and the beginning of the senior year.
 
  • #10
It really depends on the university & the country. I did Griffiths level quantum in second year, as well as Griffiths level E&M. Auletta level quantum followed in third and fourth year, along with Jackson level E&M fourth year.

Actually, just out of interest (and I don't mean to thread-jack), when does GR fit into this? We did Wald level GR in third year.
 
  • #11
M

e.bar.goum said:
It really depends on the university & the country.

Exactly.

There are a couple of ways to teach physics

You can learn the math as you go - say take basic QM in a calculus based physics course first year.

Then do more advanced QM second year from a book like Griffiths which teaches you stuff like linear algebra and partial differential equations as you go. Then do an advanced QM course final year.

Or you can do what I did. I learned Linear Algebra, Applied Linear Algebra, Partial Differential Equations, and Hilbert Spaces all as separate subjects, then did QM. You knew all the required math and progress was rapid - for me anyway.

Its purely how your school wants to do it.

My school actually varied between departments. The physics department did it the gradual way - the math department did it learning all the prerequisite math way then sent you over to the physics department for advanced QM.

They evidently used to send them to the intermediate QM classes but they were bored.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #12
Wooly, by US standards your program is a bit lacking.
A few comments:
1) Your second year courses use Young & Friedman and typically that would be a first year course here.
2) Your 3rd year quantum course is what we would call modern physics and would often be taken 1st/2nd year.
3) I saw no upper division Mechanics course, that's certainly lacking.
4) The statistical mechanics and thermodynamics bits are good, you guys use Schroeder.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
467
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K