Is Electroweak Interaction a Unified Force at High Temperatures?

hsakai
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I (moderately) understand the basics of the electromagnetic and weak nuclear forces, but I recently heard of a combined electro-weak theory. It apparently states that two forces are different manifestations of a single force at very high temperatures. Does this mean that the photon (electromagnetic force-carrier) and the W and Z particles (weak force-carriers) are the same particle at that temperature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hsakai said:
I (moderately) understand the basics of the electromagnetic and weak nuclear forces, but I recently heard of a combined electro-weak theory. It apparently states that two forces are different manifestations of a single force at very high temperatures. Does this mean that the photon (electromagnetic force-carrier) and the W and Z particles (weak force-carriers) are the same particle at that temperature?

well not the same but they behave as they were the same (photon and Z) with equal strengths.
 
By analogy, consider the electric and magnetic forces. They were originally thought to be separate phenomena, but now we know that they're different aspects of the same phenomenon. For example, a purely electric field in one frame of reference will be observed as a mixture of electric and magnetic fields in a different frame of reference. This unifies electricity and magnetism. Unification of electromagnetism with the weak force is another step in the same direction.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top