Is Engineering of Gravity and Time a Groundbreaking Theory?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a paper titled "Engineering of Gravity and Time," which proposes a theory linking gravity and time to rotation. The author finds the paper intriguing, noting that it addresses questions current theories struggle with, such as the relative weakness of gravity compared to other forces, and suggests an experiment to test its ideas. However, responses in the thread dismiss the paper as "complete hogwash," arguing that its claims about gravity are incorrect, particularly in relation to established theories like relativity. The validity of the source is also questioned, leading to the closure of the thread.
John Luis
I have recently read a paper called "Engineering of Gravity and Time" for an undergraduate student. It contains a theory of gravity and time depending on rotation.
Well.., I think it looks quiet percussive. However, fairly, it contains some worthwhile ideas, especially it answers some elementary questions that current theories can not such as "why is gravity much weaker than other forces?". It recommends an experiment at the end too.
So.., I wish you read it and tell me what you think, please.

Available at
<< Link removed.>>

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Complete hogwash.

"Earth attracts Newton’s apple and not vice versa." False.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
Hornbein said:
Complete hogwash.

"Earth attracts Newton’s apple and not vice versa." False.

This is true with respect to his theory "rotation" because Earth rotates but the apple does not ( Eq. 1). However, false with respect to relativity.
 
The link given is not to an acceptable source as per PF rules.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn

Thread 'Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025'

Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
View full post »
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'

Thread 'My experience as a hostage'

I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Does Gravity Criticism in Maxwell's Equations Apply to All Gravity-Medium Analogies?
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Is there some agreement on properties of a theory of quantum gravity?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Witten’s paper: "A Note On The Canonical Formalism for Gravity" LQG
Replies
16
Views
6K
I Two recent tests of loop quantum gravity theory
Replies
15
Views
5K
I The standard model from loop quantum gravity via spinors octonions
Replies
26
Views
4K
I Can Newtonian Gravity be Thought of as a Theory of Curved Time?
Replies
20
Views
3K
A Clarification regarding argument in EPR paper
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
I Can Core Theory Be Derived From Nine Lines?
Replies
6
Views
3K
I Are there issues with Conformal Gravity as a DM solution?
Replies
5
Views
3K
I What Are the Empirical Challenges Facing Quantum Gravity Theories?
3
Replies
105
Views
14K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top