Is Every Finite Complex Representation of a Compact Lie Group Unitary?

AI Thread Summary
A Lie group G is compact if and only if every finite complex representation of it is unitary, which is a well-established theorem. The converse is also true: if every finite complex representation is unitary, then G must be compact. Additionally, a Lie group is compact if and only if every irreducible unitary representation is finite-dimensional. If a Lie group is not compact, it does not necessarily follow that all its irreducible unitary representations are infinite-dimensional, as some may still be finite-dimensional. Understanding these relationships is crucial in the study of group theory and representation theory.
Andre' Quanta
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I am studying Group Theory at the moment and i am not sure about a theorem.
Is it true that a Lie Group G is compact if and only if every finite complex representation of it is unitary?
I know that is true the if, but what about the viceversa?
Same question.
Is it true that a Lie group is compact if and only if every irreducible representaion unitary is finite?
 
If a Lie group is not compact is it true that all its irreducibile unitary representations are infinite dimensional?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top