Is Every Nonempty Subset with the Property xy^(-1) in H a Subgroup?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hgj
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A nonempty subset H of a group G is a subgroup if for all x and y in H, the element xy^(-1) is also in H. The discussion references a theorem stating that H is a subgroup if it is closed and contains the inverses of its elements. One proposed approach is to prove that y^(-1) is in H, which would help establish both closure and the existence of inverses. Another approach involves proving closure by contradiction, showing that if xy is not in H, it leads to a contradiction. The challenge remains in proving that inverses are in H, particularly when considering the case where x equals y.
hgj
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Here's the question:

Prove that a nonempty subset H of a group G is a subgroup if for all x and y in H, the element xy^(-1) is also in H.

We have a theorem that says if G is a group and H is a nonempty subset of G, then H is a subgroup of G iff:
(1) H is closed
(2) if h is in H, then the inverse of h in G lies in H.

I know I need to use this theorem, and I have two ideas about how to go about it:
First, I think if I can prove y^(-1) is in H, then the two parts of the theorem follow from that. Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to do this.
My second thought is to prove the two parts separately. If I do this, my proof for closure is:
Assume xy is not in H. Then x is not in H or y is not in H. But this is a contradiction, so xy must be in H. Then closure is satisfied.
After this, though, I get stuck again when I try to prove part (2) about the inverse.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If for all x and y in H, xy-1 is also in H, then what happens if x = y? Using that, you will have determined the existence of another special element in H. Using that element and the knowledge that xy-1 is in H for every x, y in H, what more can you prove?

For closure, you want to prove that for all x in H, if y is in H then so is xy. If you have proven that (if y is in H then so is y-1) and you use the given fact (if x and y are in H, so is xy-1) then you can prove that xy is in H because it is true so long as:

x(y-1)-1 is in H which is true using the given assumption if
x is in H and y-1 is in H. The first is true by assumption, and the second is true because a) y is in H and b) you should have proved inverses are in H.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top