Is Every Open Neighborhood of a Limit Point in a T_1 Space Infinitely Populated?

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



Problem: Let ##A## be an infinite subset of a ##T_1## space, and let ##x## be a limit point of ##A##. Prove that every open neighborhood of ##x## contains infinitely many points of ##A##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



First note that if ##\mathcal{O}## is an open neighborhood of ##x## not containing ##y##, then there exists open neighborhoods ##U## and ##V## containing ##x## and ##y##, respectively, but not containing the other point. Hence, ##\mathcal{O} \cap U \subseteq \mathcal{O}## is an open set containing ##x## but not containing ##y##.

Proof of main theorem: Let ##\mathcal{O}## be an open neighborhood of ##x##. Then there exists ##a_1 \in \mathcal{O} \cap (A-\{x\})##. By the observation made above, we can find an open neighborhood ##\mathcal{O}_2## of ##x## that doesn't contain ##a_1## and ##\mathcal{O}_1 \subseteq \mathcal{O}##. Hence, there exists ##a_2 \in \mathcal{O}_2 \cap (A-\{x,a_1\})##. Hence ##(a_n)## is an infinite sequence of distinct points in ##A## such that ##a_n## is in ##\mathcal{O}## for every ##n \in \mathbb{N}##, thereby proving that ##\mathcal{O}## contains an infinite number of points in ##A ~ \Box##.How does this sound? It seems little shaky; perhaps it could be made slightly more rigorous.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like you are assuming that there are an infinite number of points, and showing that there are an infinite number of subsets.
 
I would recommend starting with the definitions of T_1 space, infinite subset, and limit point. Use your definitions as fuel for your proof.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top