Is expansion a result of gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter binbots
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Gravity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the expansion of space-time is influenced by the gravity of galaxies. It uses the trampoline analogy to illustrate how galaxies create gravitational wells, suggesting that as they gain mass, the space between them stretches. However, it argues that the expansion of the universe is better understood through a homogeneous and isotropic model, where galaxies do not significantly affect the overall expansion. Dark energy is introduced as a necessary concept to explain the acceleration of this expansion, separate from gravitational effects. The complexity of cosmology and the limitations of simplistic analogies like the rubber sheet are highlighted as barriers to understanding the true nature of cosmic expansion.
binbots
Messages
170
Reaction score
3
Is the expansion of space time a result of a galaxies gravity? If we take the classic trampoline example of space time I can explain what I mean. Each galaxy makes a dent in the trampoline, the more mass a galaxy gains the deeper the dent. Now if we take 2 bowling balls and place them far enough away on our trampoline that they don’t get stuck in each other’s dent then the space between them will stretch. As each galaxy gains more mass or fall into their own black hole then the space will continue to expand. It seems that the expansion of space time is a result of gravity. So why do we require dark energy?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You are stretching the analogy of bowling balls on trampolines a bit far here. To derive the expansion of the universe, we actually consider the universe to be completely homogeneous and isotropic. That is, there are no density fluctuations (galaxies, people, planets, stars, anything!). This is actually a fairly good assumption on very large distance scales. When we do this, and work through the maths, we simply find a dynamic universe, that is one that is in general expanding or contracting. And observational evidence shows, of course, that it is expanding.

Individual galaxies really have nothing to do with it. And dark energy is only postulated to explain the acceleration of the expansion of the universe.
 
The rubber sheet analogy creates more confusion than it dispells. It is wonderful for the unwashed masses - not so good for those who think outside the box. The tripping block is math. Cosmology is impossibly complex for those lacking advanced math skills.
 
Last edited:
The Hubble universe constantly expands (all zones or spheres, some of which might be as small as the Planck length, do not necessarily contract after expansion) and inrushing energy feeds the spinning fractal. As in the vortex of a tornado, the spin draws in surrounding energy leaving a depleted zone around the vortex-sphere. This third vacuum, a surface-vacuum, attracts other fractals, while the constantly expanding (Hubble expansion) spinning surface repels them. The dynamic thus created between repulsive and attractive forces is the dynamic tension that underlies all matter. At this pre-particle, fractal level no thing exists that can interfere with the expanding and spinning vortex. Stability and permanence and inertia are created by Hubble expansion. Dark matter, and its theoretic “extra” gravity, may not be matter – but the temporary attenuation of the every part of the field.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
202
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Back
Top