MHB Is \(F[x]/<p(x)>\) the Root Field of \(x^4+ax^2+b\)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kiwi1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Root
Kiwi1
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Prove that if \(p(x)=x^4+ax^2+b\) is irreducible in F[x], then \(F[x]/<p(x)>\) is the root field of p(x) over F.

My Attempt:
1. Let F(c) = \(F[x]/<p(x)>\) where c is a root of p(x). Then F(c) is a degree 4 extension over F because c is the root of a 4th order irreducible polynomial in F[x].

2. \(p(x)=x^4+ax^2+b=(x^2+\frac a2)^2-(\frac{a^2}4-b)\)

Form the extension \(F(d_1)\) where \(d_1,-d_1\) are the roots of \(x^2-[\frac{a^2}4-b]\)

Now the four roots (two each) of \(x^2+\frac a2+d_1\) and \(x^2+\frac a2-d_1\) are the four roots of p(x) in a suitable extension of F.

Let \(d_2\) be a root of \(x^2+\frac a2-d_1\) in \(F(d_1,d_2)\). So \(d_2=\sqrt{d_1-\frac a2}\) and \(\pm d_2\) are two roots of p(x). Also \(d_3=\sqrt{-d_1-\frac a2}\) are two more roots this time in \(F(d_1,d_3)\).

3. \(F(d_1,d_2)\) or \(F(d_1,d_3)\) between them contain the four roots of p(x). Choose the one that contains c. Suppose without loss of generality \(c \in F(d_1,d_2)\).

4. \(c \in F(d_1,d_2)\) so \(F(c) \subseteq F(d_1,d_2)\)
5. \(c=\pm d_2\) so \(d_2 \in F(c)\) so \(d_1=d_2^2 +\frac a2\in F(c)\)
6. \(d_1,d_2 \in F(c)\) so \(F(c) \supseteq F(d_1,d_2)\) and using (4) above \(F(c) = F(d_1,d_2)\)Now all I think I need to do is show that \(\pm d_3 \in F(d_1,d_2)\) and conclude that F(c) is a rootfield of p(x)

Unfortunately this last step has me stumped!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I solved it.

I have
"Theorem 7: Let K be the root field of some polynomial q(x) over F. For every irreducible polynomial p(x) in F[x], if p(x) has one root in K, then p(x) must have all of its roots in K."

In my problem I have \(q(x) = (x-d_2)(x+d_2)=x^2-d_2^2=x^2-d_1+\frac a2 \in F(d_1)[x]\)

So \(F(d_1,d_2)\) is the root field of q(x) over \(F(d_1)\). What's more \(c \in F(d_1,d_2)\) so by Theorem 7 all roots of p(x) (which is irreducible in \(F(d_1)\)) must be in \(F(d_1,d_2)=F(c)\)
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top