Is f(x,y) continuous at (0,0)?

Jonmundsson
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We define the function f: \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R} as

<br /> \begin{equation}<br /> f(x,y) = \frac{xy^2 ln(x^2 + y^2)}{x^2 + y^2}<br /> \end{equation}<br /> if (x,y) \neq (0,0). Also note that f(0,0) = 0.

Show that f is continuous at (0,0)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Polar coords don't work and I don't see a good way to utilize the squeeze theorem which leaves me with delta epsilon. I'm terrible with delta epsilon proofs so I'm wondering if someone can get me started and I'll take it from there.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jonmundsson said:

Homework Statement


We define the function f: \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R} as

<br /> \begin{equation}<br /> f(x,y) = \frac{xy^2 ln(x^2 + y^2)}{x^2 + y^2}<br /> \end{equation}<br /> if (x,y) \neq (0,0). Also note that f(0,0) = 0.

Show that f is continuous at (0,0)

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


Polar coords don't work and I don't see a good way to utilize the squeeze theorem which leaves me with delta epsilon. I'm terrible with delta epsilon proofs so I'm wondering if someone can get me started and I'll take it from there.

Thanks.

What is the problem with polar coord's?
 
I get ln(r^2) which is undefined as r \to 0
 
Jonmundsson said:

Homework Statement


We define the function f: \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R} as

<br /> \begin{equation}<br /> f(x,y) = \frac{xy^2 ln(x^2 + y^2)}{x^2 + y^2}<br /> \end{equation}<br /> if (x,y) \neq (0,0). Also note that f(0,0) = 0.

Show that f is continuous at (0,0)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Polar coords don't work and I don't see a good way to utilize the squeeze theorem which leaves me with delta epsilon. I'm terrible with delta epsilon proofs so I'm wondering if someone can get me started and I'll take it from there.

Thanks.

I think polar coordinates will work. Why do you think they don't?
 
I figured it out. I feel pretty dumb now.

It's just like \displaystyle \lim _{x \to 0} x sin(1/x) = 0 but \displaystyle \lim _{x \to 0} sin(1/x) is undefined.

Thanks for the help.
 
Jonmundsson said:
I figured it out. I feel pretty dumb now.

It's just like \displaystyle \lim _{x \to 0} x sin(1/x) = 0 but \displaystyle \lim _{x \to 0} sin(1/x) is undefined.

Thanks for the help.
Yes.

I assume you got
r ln(r2) sin2(θ) cos(θ) .​
Then took the limit of that as r → 0 .
 
Jonmundsson said:
I figured it out. I feel pretty dumb now.

It's just like \displaystyle \lim _{x \to 0} x sin(1/x) = 0 but \displaystyle \lim _{x \to 0} sin(1/x) is undefined.

Thanks for the help.

I think it's more like a l'Hopital's rule proof. But glad you got it.
 
Back
Top