Is f(z)=x differentiable with respect to z?

  • Thread starter Thread starter inurface323
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiable
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f(z) = x is not differentiable with respect to the complex variable z, defined as z = x + iy, because it fails to satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations. The limit definition of the derivative was applied, demonstrating that the limit approaches different values when taken along different paths in the complex plane. Specifically, the limit along the real axis yields 1, while the limit along the imaginary axis yields 0, confirming the non-existence of the derivative. This analysis highlights the importance of path independence in complex differentiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex variables, specifically z = x + iy.
  • Knowledge of the Cauchy-Riemann equations and their significance in complex analysis.
  • Familiarity with the limit definition of the derivative in the context of complex functions.
  • Basic skills in mathematical notation, particularly for expressing limits and derivatives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cauchy-Riemann equations in detail to understand conditions for differentiability in complex analysis.
  • Learn about complex derivatives and the implications of path dependence in limits.
  • Explore examples of differentiable and non-differentiable functions in the complex plane.
  • Practice using mathematical notation for complex functions to improve clarity in communication.
USEFUL FOR

Students of complex analysis, mathematicians, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of differentiability in the context of complex variables.

inurface323
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The only thing given is f(z)=x. However, I am under the assumption that z is a complex variable where z=x+iy. I'm also assuming that x is a real variable.

In this example, I know that f(z)=x is not differentiable with respect to z because it does not satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann Equations but I need to prove this using the limit definition of the derivative.

Homework Equations



I used the definition of the limit i.e. limit as h→0 [f(x+h)-f(x)]/h however I'm not quite sure what f(x+h) translates into in this problem.

The Attempt at a Solution



this may be a straight forward question that I'm over thinking but I get lim Δz→0 [Δx/Δz] which does not exist. Is that correct?

This is my first post. I don't know how to enter math notation that is easier to read. Help with that would also be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that z is a complex number so the limits are taken in the complex plane. That is two-dimensional so there are an infinite number of ways of taking a limit, not just "from below" and "from above".

The derivative at, say, z_0= x_0+ iy_0, is given by \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(z_0+ h)- f(z_0)}{h} and h itself is a complex number.

Suppose we take the limit as h approaches 0 along the a line parallel to the real axis. Write f(z)= u(x,y)+ iv(x,y), we have u(x,y)= x and v(x,y)= 0.

\lim{h\to 0}\frac{u(x_0+h,y_0)+ iv(x_0+h,y_0)- u(x_0,y_0)- iv(x_0,y_0}{h}= \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{x_0+ h- x_0}{h}= 1

Now take the limit as h goes to 0 parallel to the imaginary axis: h is now ih:
\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{u(x_0, y_0+ h)+ iv(x_0, y_0+h)- u(x_0,y_0)- iv(x_0,y_0)}{ih}= \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{x_0- x_0}{ih}= 0
since those are not the same, the limit as h goes to 0 along different paths is different. The limit itself does not exist.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K