Is G_nm Isomorphic to G_n x G_m?

  • Thread starter Thread starter barbiemathgurl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Isomorphism
barbiemathgurl
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Let k be a positive integer.

define G_k = {x| 1<= x <= k with gcd(x,k)=1}

prove that:
a)G_k is a group under multiplication modulos k (i can do that).

b)G_nm = G_n x G_m be defining an isomorphism.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you done for b)? There is only one possible way you can think of to write out a map from G_nm to G_n x G_m, so prove it is an isomorphism. Remember, G_n x G_m looks like pars (x,y)...
 
We can use the Chinese Remainder Theorem on this one.

Define the mapping,
\phi: G_{nm}\mapsto G_n\times G_m
As,
\phi(x) = (x\bmod{n} , x\bmod{m})

1)The homomorphism part is trivial.
2)The bijection part is covered by Chinese Remainder Theorem.
 
but the point is to prove that theorem.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top