Is Gravity a Result of Other Forces at Work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Azmodii
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a theory proposing that gravity is not a constant force but rather a result of other manipulating forces. The original poster has shared their work with a professor, who finds it promising and has circulated it among other physicists. They express skepticism towards superstring theory and graviton concepts, arguing that their equation provides a more seamless and accurate measurement of gravitational forces. However, some participants question the validity of the claims due to the lack of formal presentation and adherence to established scientific guidelines. The thread concludes with a reminder that personal theories should be published in reputable journals for serious consideration.
Azmodii
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I Have Been Toying With The Idea That Gravity Itself Is Not A Constant Force And Is In Fact A Result Of Other Forces At Work. I Have Passed My Work Onto My Professor And He Is Very Interested And Thinks I May Be Onto Something Big. He Has Passed My Equation On To Several Other Physicians.

I Cant Reveal My Work, However I Would Like A Manner Of Opinions On This Subject.

Heres The Rundown.

I Dont Like The Superstring Theories Idea Of Gravitons As The Main Reason For Gravitational Forces, As Gravity Is Refered To As A Constant Of Sorts, And If That Was So, The Equal/Inequal Equation Would Result In A Stalemate, As The Inequal Is Equal. If You Run With The Anti Matter Idea, Then The Result Is Nothing, As Annihilation Occurs When The Two Act Together.

I Prefer To Think That The Answer Is Another Similar Force That Can Manipulate Gravity Itself, You Can Try It At Home, They Use It On The Space Station, They Use It In Zero-G Chambers At NASA, But No One Has Stopped To Ponder If The Force They Are Using To Inhibit Gravity Is In Fact The Cause?

In Every Case, My Equation Has Been Entirely Correct In Measuring Gravity, And Gravitational Forces, Applied To Any Object.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And Yes I Know The Superstring Theory Has Answers, But None Are As Seamless As Relativity, Where As, My Equation Is Seamless And To Put It In Perspective, Tiny And Simple.
 
Here's an opinion:

I've just finish debating one bloke who also claimed he had found a "simple" explanation for the cause of gravity and who posted absolutely no symbolical formalism, who only spoke in tall words... much like what you have postet here

In the end he was finally forced to admit that he hadn't got the slightes clue what he was talking about...

If you can't reveal what this is about, then I can't give you any sincere opinion... that's it.
 
Please read our site guide lines regarding personal theories. When your work is published in an acceptable journal feel free to come back.

Thead locked.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top