Is Group Velocity Dispersion Infinite for Light in Air?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the group-velocity dispersion parameter (D) for light in air, which is argued to be infinite due to the constancy of group velocity. This implies that the pulse of light spreads rapidly. The confusion arises from the mathematical treatment of the dispersion parameter, particularly regarding the second derivative of wave vector (k) with respect to frequency (w). The participants clarify that the correct interpretation of the derivatives is crucial, as it affects the understanding of dispersion in this context. Ultimately, the discussion resolves around the nuances of the mathematical definitions and their implications for light propagation in air.
Dimani4
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hey ppl,
I have a question for you.

For the case of light propagation in the air the the group-velocity dispersion parameter D is infinity because the derivative of the group velocity should be a zero (group velocity is constant ; w=ck and Vgroup=dw/dk). Who can explain me this? dispersion parameter is infinity meaning that the pulse will spread very fast. I never thought about that question but maybe I'm wrong. Plz clarify me that point.

formula for D parameter you can find here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispersion_(optics)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the question is solved. you can't not turn upside down the second derivative. i.e

a=(Dispersion parameter)=(approx) d2(k)/d2(w)\neq1/d2(w)/d2(k). here was the problem. in the case of light propagation through the air a should equal to zero.d2()-second derivative=\partial2

d2(k)/d2(w)=\partial2k/\partial2w
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top