Is Inertia the Key to Explaining Bullet Trajectory?

AI Thread Summary
Inertia does not prevent a bullet from falling to the ground; it falls at the same rate as if it were dropped. The discussion highlights the role of angular momentum in stabilizing projectiles, particularly with the introduction of rifled barrels that improved accuracy through rotational motion. The historical context of musket evolution illustrates how advancements in weaponry changed military tactics. The conversation emphasizes that curiosity about physics is valid, regardless of one's mathematical background. Ultimately, understanding these principles can enhance comprehension of projectile motion and its implications in historical contexts.
danihel
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hello ppl I am very interested in knowing how the world works but i did not study physics and I am mentally and especially mathematically challenged so please forgive me my silly question:
as the angular momentum prevents gyroscope from falling on the side does inertia prevent a bullet(when shot in parallel with the surface) to fall on the ground as quickly as it would if it were just dropped? Is angular momentum and inertia fundamentally the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Asking such a question proves you are NOT mentally challanged...and everybody is mathematically challanged in varying degrees. Some of the greatest scientific discoveries were not fully understood until others got a chance to interpret and improve the early attempts. Following Einsteins relativity, for example, it was Minkowski who procalimed the four dimensional spacetime continuum...and Einstein adopted it...


I don't know the exact principles involved but at about the time of the US civil war muskets got upgraded from smooth to "rifle" bore...meaning rotational grooves were made within the rifle barrel to twist/rotate the shot as it passed...the rotational motion (angular momentum) made the shot far more accurate ...I suspect momentum was increased...and had the generals involved been a bit smarter, they would have changed tactics.

The old "line up the men" and fire at the lined up enemy was due in large part to how inaccurate smooth bore muskets previously were...hence the losses in battles with improved weaponry was catastrophically large.
 
danihel said:
does inertia prevent a bullet(when shot in parallel with the surface) to fall on the ground as quickly as it would if it were just dropped?
A bullet does fall to the ground just as quickly as if it were just dropped.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top