Is Interstellar Travel Possible with Current Propulsion Technology?

AI Thread Summary
Interstellar travel with current propulsion technology faces significant challenges, primarily due to the mass and fuel requirements for acceleration and deceleration. A spacecraft would need to carry enough propellant to continue accelerating, which complicates its mass and efficiency. Alternatively, collecting propellant en route poses logistical issues, as the interstellar medium is sparse and high-speed capture would require considerable energy. While current probes like Voyager and New Horizons demonstrate the feasibility of long-distance travel, they are too slow for practical interstellar missions. Advanced concepts involving fission, fusion, or antimatter propulsion could potentially enable speeds of up to 10% of the speed of light, making interstellar travel more achievable.
dfinch
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Let's say a ship is beyond Earth's meaningful gravity pull, and has solar panels. Assume that it can collect solar power and use it in a system which blasts propellant away from the ship to accelerate through space. The ship's goal is to leave the solar system and reach a new star, but to continue accelerating for half the distance, and decellerating the remainder, versus just drifting at a constant velocity. To me, this gives us two options:

1. The ship must leave our solar system with enough propellant to continue accelerating. This seems problematic because for every kg of propellant it takes with, the mass grows, negating the benefits of bringing the propellant with.

2. The ship must collect propellant along the way. This seems problematic because the ship is unlikely to encounter an appropriate amount of propellant along its linear path, or to solve the logistical problems associated with capturing them at high speed.

This makes me think it's unlikely we could ever build a ship capable of propelling to another star.

I hope my thinking is flawed?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
See Bussard Ramjet. Even at Earth, solar irradiation is only 1350 Watts meter^-2
 
It's extremely unlikely that any interstellar ship will continually accelerate halfway and then decelerate. The amount of fuel required is staggeringly huge. Gathering fuel on the way probably won't work either, as the interstellar medium is not very dense and the faster you're traveling, the less effective this method is. You'll slow down when you gather the fuel since the fuel has to accelerate up to your speed. The faster you go, the more energy this takes.
 
dfinch said:
This makes me think it's unlikely we could ever build a ship capable of propelling to another star.
We can. The Voyager and Pioneer probes are doing exactly this and New Horizons will follow them. They are just all way too slow for practical purposes and won't stay active long enough.

There are concepts that would allow significantly higher speeds - up to ~10% the speed of light, that would allow to reach the nearest stars in decades. Most of them use fission or fusion (some even consider antimatter) as their high energy density allows high exhaust velocities. Some use sail-like structures that would rely on a beam sent from the solar system. See Project Longshot and the various links in the navigation box at the bottom, or Category:Interstellar travel.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
509
Replies
61
Views
9K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
12
Views
2K
2
Replies
96
Views
9K
Replies
30
Views
7K
Back
Top