Is It Legal to Develop Your Own Driver for a Purchased Device?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jaynte
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the legality of developing custom drivers for a device when the provided SDK or drivers are unsatisfactory. It emphasizes the importance of reviewing the license agreement that accompanies the SDK, as it dictates what modifications are permissible. Modifying the SDK for personal use may differ legally from creating and reselling modified versions. The conversation also touches on whether companies can alter license agreements for individual customers seeking to build custom devices, noting that smaller companies may be more flexible in this regard. The legality of reverse engineering to create a driver is mentioned, particularly in the U.S., where it may require a "dirty room" or "clean room" environment to avoid copyright infringement. Consulting a corporate attorney is advised for clarity on specific legalities, especially regarding proprietary protocols.
Jaynte
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Hi

This is more a question in law rather than a programming issue. But I think here is the right place to get an answer. Could'nt get much answers from google.

Suppose I buy a device from a company and I'm not very happy with the SDK and or drivers they supply (due to bugs or whatever). Is it legal for me (or my company) to develop my own driver for communicating directly with the device firmware? Where I for example use USB snooping to figgure out the device's communication protocol.
 
Technology news on Phys.org
Jaynte said:
Hi

This is more a question in law rather than a programming issue. But I think here is the right place to get an answer. Could'nt get much answers from google.

Suppose I buy a device from a company and I'm not very happy with the SDK and or drivers they supply (due to bugs or whatever). Is it legal for me (or my company) to develop my own driver for communicating directly with the device firmware? Where I for example use USB snooping to figgure out the device's communication protocol.

The SDK will almost certainly come with some sort of license agreement. Have a look at that to see what is allowed in terms of modification. If you are just modifying some part of the SDK for your own use, that would probably be different than if you modified part of the device and resold a number of them (thus profiting from the partial intellectual property of the SDK developers).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you berkeman. That sounds reasonable.

A follow up question then:

Is a company allowed to modify the license agreement for single customers (like me) if asked for permission to build a "custom" device?
 
Jaynte said:
Thank you berkeman. That sounds reasonable.

A follow up question then:

Is a company allowed to modify the license agreement for single customers (like me) if asked for permission to build a "custom" device?

I believe so. It depends on the company, and how interested they are in helping you with your product. My company fairly often does such modifications and custom license agreements, especially if it looks like it might open up new markets for our products.

The bigger the company you deal with though, generally the harder it is to do such deals. Maybe give their Customer Support folks a phone call to ask about such a license modification. Heck, in the end they may want to pay you to incorporate your improved drivers into their standard products! :smile:
 
Thank you, its worth a try then to talk to this supposed company :)
 
Jaynte said:
Is it legal for me (or my company) to develop my own driver for communicating directly with the device firmware?
In the USA it could be legal to develop your own driver, but it might require a "dirty room" / "clean room" environment. The dirty room employees are allowed to reverse engineer the product or in this case the driver. They then have to produce a document that describes the driver from an external viewpoint (it's expected outputs for given inputs), which is usually reviewed by a lawyer that's familiar with the laws and the type of product involved to make sure no copyright infringment exists within the document. If the device is using some unique proprietary protocol, that could be an issue. A company could create it's on device and it's own protocol, but I'm not sure about using an existing protocol. Links to wiki articles about reverse engineering, but you'd need to consult a corporate attorney.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_engineering

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_room_design
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'
I've tried to intuit public key encryption but never quite managed. But this seems to wrap it up in a bow. This seems to be a very elegant way of transmitting a message publicly that only the sender and receiver can decipher. Is this how PKE works? No, it cant be. In the above case, the requester knows the target's "secret" key - because they have his ID, and therefore knows his birthdate.
I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...
Back
Top