Is it maximum voltage or RMS voltage

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinction between maximum (peak) voltage and RMS (root mean square) voltage in AC power calculations. Participants clarify that phasors are typically expressed in RMS values unless specified otherwise, with the formula for power being Vrms * Irms * cos(angle). The relationship between peak and RMS values is highlighted, emphasizing that using RMS allows for direct comparisons with DC signals. There is also a focus on the correct application of these values in calculating apparent and active power, with some confusion surrounding the use of conjugate currents. Overall, the conversation reinforces the importance of understanding voltage and current definitions in power analysis.
jaus tail
Messages
613
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


upload_2018-1-19_12-44-30.png


Homework Equations


I drew phasors and got the answer. Angle between V and I is 60 degrees. Cosine of 60 is 0.5. Then I multiplied V and I and divided it by 2.

The Attempt at a Solution


I got answer 62.5. But I'm not sure if values of V and I given are rms values or maximum value.
Isn't formula for Power as: Vrms * I rms cos(angle)
So shouldn't it be: 25/1.414 * 5/1.414 * cos(angle)?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-19_12-44-30.png
    upload_2018-1-19_12-44-30.png
    13.6 KB · Views: 1,821
Physics news on Phys.org
The book that I have (Power System Analysis by Charles A. Gross) write phasors using the rms value, i.e. the phasor ##V= \frac{V_{max}}{\sqrt{2}} \angle \phi##
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave and jaus tail
Hi.
It is a convention to express the value of the voltage or current phasor as the RMS magnitude of it. Much like the passive sign convention, this is widely known and acknowledged in electronics, unless stated otherwise.

That is, if:
V_{m} \cos ( \omega t + \alpha)<br /> = \Re({V_{m} \cdot e^{j( \omega t + \alpha) } }) = \Re( {V_{m} \cdot e^{j (\omega t) } \cdot e^{j (\alpha )} } ) \underbrace{ \rightarrow }_{\text{Phasor domain/ transform} } \frac{ V_{m} }{ \sqrt{ 2 } } \angle{\alpha}
The above is, of course, if you are using the cosine definition of a phasor, you can also use a sine definition in which case the signal would have to be phase shifted to the right by 90 (add - 90 ) to your cosine. The relation between peak and RMS for sinusoids is a result of the evaluation of the integral and using the definition of an RMS signal, the proof can be found online but the main concept is that the RMS value allows comparision with DC signals, as far as resistive elements are concerned.

Formula for average power in the AC domain is:
\frac{1}{2} \cdot V_{m} I_{m} \cos { ( \alpha_{v} - \alpha_{i} } )
Where:
V_{m} I_{m}
Refer to peak values.
When using RMS, V and I become respective values and the equation is :
V_{rms} I_{rms} \cos { ( \alpha_{v} - \alpha_{i} } )
Your answer is correct as far as I know.
If you use peak values, you multiply by a half, and if you use rms, you get the same answer as the square root of two is present in both I and V rms.
Thanks for reading.
KM
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jaus tail
In my opinion, the voltage and current are rms.

However, when you calculate the apparent power you have to use the conjugate current.
 
  • Like
Likes jaus tail
Okay. So if values are given in form V angle (45o) then V is the RMS value.
But if it's given like V sin (wt + 45) then V is maximum value. Right?
 
  • Like
Likes K Murty
The result it is S[apparent power-VA]=P[active power-W]62.5+jQ[reactive power-VAR]108.25
In order to achieve this you have to multiply Vے α=V.cos(α),V.sin(α) by Iے β conjugate = Iے -β
I.cos(β),-I.sin(β).
 
  • Like
Likes jaus tail
I'm not sure.
From what I know:
draw V
draw I
and P is V times I times cosine of angle between them
Q is V times I times sine of angle between them
V = 25 angle 15
I = 5 angle -45
So this is
upload_2018-1-21_11-21-16.png

So P is V times I times cos 60... no sin term
Q is V times I times sin 60

I didnt understand this:
Vے α=V.cos(α),V.sin(α) by Iے β conjugate = Iے -β
I.cos(β),-I.sin(β).
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-21_11-21-16.png
    upload_2018-1-21_11-21-16.png
    3.6 KB · Views: 744
  • Like
Likes K Murty
Since ,conventional, inductive reactive power has to be positive [and capacitive negative], if the current lags 15+45=60 degrees[ then the angle it is -60 degrees] then:
P=V.I.cos(+60) Q=V.I.sin(+60)
See –for instance:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_conjugate
upload_2018-1-21_8-48-3.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-21_8-48-3.png
    upload_2018-1-21_8-48-3.png
    7.5 KB · Views: 742
  • Like
Likes jaus tail
That phasor clears up the I* part. I never understood what its purpose was. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top