Is it possible for photons to dissappear in vacuum.

  • Thread starter Thread starter leoneri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons Vacuum
leoneri
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am reading Introduction to Statistical Physics by Kerson Huang. On chapter 10 about Bose Gas, a statement intrigued me. He explains Photons.

"Photons are the quanta of the Electromagnetic field. They are bosons whose number is not conserved, for they may be created and absorbed singly. The Lagrange multiplier corresponding to total number is absent, and the chemical potential \mu is zero. This means that the particles can dissappear into the vacuum."

I can't help but wondering myself if this is really true. If it's gone then where does it go? Is it disappear because Photon is a quantization of energy and not a 'real' particle? What is the definition of vacuum in this context?

From my Physics course, what I understand about EM field is that an exponential decay ~e^{-x} only occurs when there is material (and hence not vacuum) that absorbs the photons. While in vacuum, the field will oscillate harmonically ~~ e^{i x} and will goes on forever ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you can represent things in different contexts, for instance in high energy physics the photon is treated as a "real" particle just as everyone else.

Now in statistical mechanics, photons are excitations of the EM field as you said, and what "This means that the particles can dissappear into the vacuum" only means that we also can deexcite the EM-field to the ground state - i.e. no excitations in energy and hence no photons - and the vacuum is just a fancy word for the ground state.
 
A photon cannot "disappear into vacuum". Each photon has a non-zero momentum and energy. Photon's disappearance would mean violation of both momentum and energy conservation laws.

Eugene.
 
meopemuk said:
A photon cannot "disappear into vacuum". Each photon has a non-zero momentum and energy. Photon's disappearance would mean violation of both momentum and energy conservation laws.

Eugene.

And angular momentum.

Torquil
 
It can disapear but it just means that it's absorbed by another particle. If you have changed the Energy of a system, you must have a particle scattered by that.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top