Prabesh Pokharel
If so how can we do that?
Or a star.jbriggs444 said:You can refract it with a lens or a prism.
DaveC426913 said:Or a star.
But for some smaller applications that might be impractical.
yup, but a really awesome and cool scaleboneh3ad said:I mean, isn't that technically still a (gravitational) lens, though?
Of course, in the case of a gravitational lens, the light is technically traveling in a straight line and we merely regard it as bent because of our prejudice toward the expected behavior of a space-time free from intrinsic curvature.boneh3ad said:I mean, isn't that technically still a (gravitational) lens, though?
I suspect that's a bit too advanced for this OPjbriggs444 said:Of course, in the case of a gravitational lens, the light is technically traveling in a straight line and we merely regard it as bent because of our prejudice toward the expected behavior of a space-time free from intrinsic curvature.
Yeah. The reason I mentioned it is that it is a lens that does not require the light to pass through - and be degraded by - a medium.boneh3ad said:I mean, isn't that technically still a (gravitational) lens, though?
Perhaps, but it might be unfair to second-guess the OP. They gave no clues about the intended application, or level of knowledge.phinds said:I suspect that's a bit too advanced for this OP
Based on the original question, I stand by my statement.DaveC426913 said:Perhaps, but it might be unfair to second-guess the OP. They gave no clues about the intended application, or level of knowledge.
A gradual change between different refractive indices will make a laser beam follow a Curved Path, which could be a bit more striking than a sharp kink on the way through. For that to happen (visibly) in air, you would need a long path and some extreme differences in temperature for two layers. But a laser beam can carry a long way and be visible from the side (dust scattering etc) so it may be realisable. Perhaps a fuzzy boundary between two miscible liquids would work.CWatters said:Material with graded refractive index. See also mirage.
I am shocked, shocked to find that is going on in here.phinds said:Anybody notice how we are just talking to ourselves here? The OP has not been back in the 8 days since he posted the question.