Is it possible to recycle vehicle emissions in order to generate elect

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeremybigideas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emissions Vehicle
AI Thread Summary
Recycling vehicle emissions to generate electricity through small turbines is theoretically possible but highly inefficient. The energy available in a car's exhaust is minimal, and attempting to harness it with numerous tiny turbines would likely reduce overall efficiency rather than enhance it. Adding turbines would increase exhaust pressure, requiring more power from the engine and negating any potential energy gains. Using a helium balloon to offset weight would create significant air drag, making it impractical for vehicle use. Overall, the concept faces substantial technical challenges that limit its feasibility.
jeremybigideas
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I’ve been doing some research and thinking recently into how vehicle emissions might be used to generate electricity in order to power the vehicle itself. I’ve seen a few products and research projects centred on this topic, although they all seem to be focused on converting the heat in the exhaust into potential energy.

Would it be possible to use a vehicle’s emissions and force them through piping with large numbers of small generators, effectively creating a wind-farm within your own car. I respect it would take thousands if not millions of tiny wind turbines to complete this, but I’d really appreciate some help with regards to the equations and formulas of wind to potential energy conversion.

Could such a system be suspended using a helium balloon to lessen the weight exerted on the car?

If you had enough turbines could you simply use a very small amount of wind (vehicle emissions) in order to the supply the system?

Many thanks,
Jeremy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might generate enough electricity to light a small bulb or two, but using thousands or millions of tiny wind turbines would not be very efficient. There is only so much energy in a car's exhaust stream, and dividing it up into smaller and smaller parcels does not create more energy, only less. That's why cars with turbochargers have one or two turbos: anything more complicated is more expensive to produce and less reliable in service.

Driving around with helium balloons suspended over your car is also problematic: how to be sure the balloon would not be ripped away going into a tunnel or under a bridge? Plus, you have to provide the car with extra power to overcome dragging a balloon around everywhere.
 
The maximal energy you can get in that way is the kinetic energy of the exhaust, and that is tiny. Increasing the number of turbines does not help.
In addition, adding turbines would increase the necessary pressure in the exhaust line - and therefore the motor would need more power to push it out. I guess adding turbines would actually reduce the efficiency.

Could such a system be suspended using a helium balloon to lessen the weight exerted on the car?
Adding a helium balloon with any notable effect in terms of weight increases air drag so much that you cannot use it as a car any more. If you make it big enough, you get a Zeppelin ;).

If you had enough turbines could you simply use a very small amount of wind (vehicle emissions) in order to the supply the system?
No.
 
If you want a non-negligible amount of power extracted, this will serve to restrict the tailpipe. This will, in turn require the engine to work harder, so you end up using more energy than you extract.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top