Is It True You Can Freeze a Bottle of Water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter garytse86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
AI Thread Summary
Supercooling water in a sealed bottle can lead to an interesting phenomenon where the water remains liquid even below its freezing point. This occurs when the bottle is filled to the top and tightly sealed, allowing the water to reach temperatures just below zero degrees Celsius without freezing due to pressure from expansion. When the bottle is disturbed, such as by hitting it, the sudden drop in pressure can trigger rapid freezing, turning the supercooled water into ice almost instantly. This process is known as supercooling and is a delicate balance of temperature and pressure.
garytse86
Messages
311
Reaction score
0
I have heard that:

if you put a bottle of water in the freezer, but not long enough to change state to solid, then you take the bottle out, and hit the container and the whole bottle of water should turn into a solid...

is this true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
garytse86,

If the bottle is filled right to the top and it has a tight lid, it's possible. You'd want to get the water to just below zero degrees, and then the pressure from its expansion would prevent it from freezing. Then when the bottle is broken, the pressure drops, and at sub 0 temp, the water freezes.
 
It's possible to "supercool" the liquid --cool the liquid to below 0^0 C. Hairy but possible. Hitting the bottle (not necessarily breaking it) may cause the water to freeze.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top