Is Λ the ∑ particle? or is Λ the Δ particle? notation clarification

  • Thread starter Thread starter rwooduk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation Particle
rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
ive noticed some problems have the quark composition of Λ as uds, but in the Baryon Octuplet that is the same composition as ∑. I always thought Λ was another way of writing Δ, so the quark composition would be ddu, am I wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are wrong, Λ (Lambda) and Δ (Delta) are different greek letters and different particles.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Yes, you are wrong. The Lambda and the Delta are different particles with different symbols. The bottom line of the triangle is significant. The neutral Sigma and Lambda have the same quark content, but are still different particles, just as C2H6O can be either ethanol or dimethyl ether.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks for clearing that up, much appreciated.
 
The u and d quarks in the Lambda are in a spin zero state.
The u and d quarks in the Sigma0 are in a spin one state.
 
They are excitations of the same quark content bound state...Just as Δ+ is an excitation of the proton...
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top