What is the nature of light and how does it affect our world?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gordonisnz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Physical
gordonisnz
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've just been thinking (saw another thread about light).

Is light a physical item (Ie a brick..- Though on a atomic level)..

what causes light to go "fast", & as it hits us, why aren't we crushed with all the weight ?
(or is light weightless ?? )

as light doesn't pass through things (IE a thick piece of paper), does light just stop traveling & cease to exist (after lighting up the object being hit)...

what happens to the atoms making up the light after the light stops / ends. ?

I guess some scientific paper has already been written about the above questions...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gordonisnz said:
Hi,

I've just been thinking (saw another thread about light).

Is light a physical item (Ie a brick..- Though on a atomic level)..

what causes light to go "fast", & as it hits us, why aren't we crushed with all the weight ?
(or is light weightless ?? )

as light doesn't pass through things (IE a thick piece of paper), does light just stop traveling & cease to exist (after lighting up the object being hit)...

what happens to the atoms making up the light after the light stops / ends. ?

I guess some scientific paper has already been written about the above questions...
To begin with, study Electromagnetism.
 
light has no mass , but it has energy and momentum and a gravitational field .
 
gordonisnz said:
Is light a physical item (Ie a brick..- Though on a atomic level)..
The term "physical" isn't really well-defined, or useful.

gordonisnz said:
what causes light to go "fast", & as it hits us, why aren't we crushed with all the weight ?
(or is light weightless ?? )
Photons have momentum, and it's transferred to you when it hits you. If you could produce truly absurd amounts of light, it would cause a significant pressure.

gordonisnz said:
as light doesn't pass through things (IE a thick piece of paper), does light just stop traveling & cease to exist (after lighting up the object being hit)...
You could say that. The light gets absorbed.

gordonisnz said:
what happens to the atoms making up the light after the light stops / ends. ?
Light isn't made of atoms. If you mean the atoms that interacts with the light, three things can happen: a) An electron is emitted by the atom, b) An electron moves up to a higher energy level. It will sooner or later fall back down, and when that happens, light is emitted so that energy is conserved, c) the atom gets a different momentum (the total momentum must be conserved). A photon with really absurd amounts of energy (an absurdly short wavelength) could do other things, like smash the nucleus to pieces, but that probably hasn't happened since some small fraction of a second after the big bang.

gordonisnz said:
I guess some scientific paper has already been written about the above questions...
Yes. :smile:
 
Most people actually get confused when they come across the study of the DUAL NATURE OF LIGHT.Light is actually all about photons.

Now as you meant to be BLOWN AWAY by the intensity of light :p
consider the wavelength of light, you will get your anwer yourself.

Light is sometimes a very astonishing thing to think about !
:)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top