Is Light a String in the Vibrating Geometry of the Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris Walters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Strings
Chris Walters
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I am asking is light as it is related to particles could be (wave/particle theory)
could be composed of strings.

http://www.geocities.com/physicsquestion2007

Has anyone seen any publications or authors who support this idea?

Chris Walters
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Umm well in String theory Yes >.< In string theory every fundamental particle is no longer a point or sphere, but a vibrating string.
 
Geometry?

Gib Z said:
Umm well in String theory Yes >.< In string theory every fundamental particle is no longer a point or sphere, but a vibrating string.

Is there any convergence upon a geometry of these vibrating strings? I've often thought WFHagen's Engergiewirbel could be thought of as string geometry - though I'm not sure he would agree. What I found exciting was that this single force vector (string?) could be used explain pair creation/anilliation, particle geometry, weak and strong NF, and even gravity. I would think the string community would resonate with it. :)
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Back
Top