1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Is Light a Wave or a Particle?

  1. Dec 28, 2005 #1


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor


    Contributed by Marlon and ZapperZ.

    In our ordinary world, “wave” and “particle” behavior are two different and opposite characteristics. It is difficult for us to think that they can be one of the same. Is light a particle or a wave? The simple, naïve answer to that is “both” or “neither”.

    Light, or photon, was never defined as a “particle” the way we normally define a particle. Light is not defined to have a definite boundary in space like a ping-pong ball, or a grain of sand. Instead, light is defined as having quanta of energy. So the discreteness is not defined as discrete object in space, but rather in the energy it can carry. Already, this is not your regular “particle”, and should not be confused as such.

    Secondly, in quantum mechanics, the description and properties of light has only ONE, single, consistent formulation, not two. This formulation (be it via the ordinary Schrodinger equation, or the more complex Quantum Electrodynamics or QED), describes ALL characteristics of light – both the wave-like behavior and the particle-like behavior. Unlike classical physics, quantum mechanics does not need to switch gears to describe the wave-like and particle-like observations. This is all accomplished by one consistent theory.

    So there is no duality – at least not within quantum mechanics. We still use the “duality” description of light when we try to describe light to laymen because wave and particle are behavior most people are familiar with. However, it doesn’t mean that in physics, or in the working of physicists, such a duality has any significance.
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 7, 2016 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    The problems with that word 'particle' are with us because, imo, Richard Feynman used the term so much. He knew what he meant by it but I don't think he realised that Joe Public did not understand the strict way he used it. As his word is Law, with Science students, the misapprehension has persisted. If only he had decided to use a different word, we could have sorted this out, long ago.
    As for the 'granular' nature of the Universe; that is still under discussion, afaik.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted