LaTeX Is Mandatory LaTeX Implementation on PF Beneficial for Members?

[chroot]

<br /> \begin{pmatrix} D_1t&amp;-a_{12}t_2&amp;\dots&amp;-a_{1n}t_n\\<br /> -a_{21}t_1&amp;D_2t&amp;\dots&amp;-a_{2n}t_n\\<br /> -a_{n1}t_1&amp;-a_{n2}t_2&amp;\dots&amp;D_nt<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />

 

[chroot]

\frac{a}{b}

 

[chroot]

<br /> \int\!\!\!\int\!\!\!\int f(u,v,w)\,du\,dv\,dw<br />

 

[chroot]

\mu
\nu
\xi
\phi

 

[chroot]

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

 

[chroot]

<br /> \int_{0}^{1} x dx = \left[ \frac{1}{2}x^2 \right]_{0}^{1} = \frac{1}{2}<br />

v(t) = v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2

<br /> \int_{0}^{1} y dy = \left[ \frac{1}{2}y^2 \right]_{0}^{1} = \frac{1}{2}<br />

v(t) = v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2

<br /> \int_{0}^{1} z dz = \left[ \frac{1}{2}z^2 \right]_{0}^{1} = \frac{1}{2}<br />

v(t) = v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2

 

[chroot]

Test.

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by chroot
<br /> \int_{0}^{1} x dx = \left[ \frac{1}{2}x^2 \right]_{0}^{1} = \frac{1}{2}<br />

v(t) = v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2

<br /> \int_{0}^{1} y dy = \left[ \frac{1}{2}y^2 \right]_{0}^{1} = \frac{1}{2}<br />

v(t) = v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2

<br /> \int_{0}^{1} z dz = \left[ \frac{1}{2}z^2 \right]_{0}^{1} = \frac{1}{2}<br />

v(t) = v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by chroot
<br /> \int_{0}^{1} u du = \left[ \frac{1}{2}u^2 \right]_{0}^{1} = \frac{1}{2}<br />

v(t) = v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2

<br /> \int_{0}^{1} v dv = \left[ \frac{1}{2}v^2 \right]_{0}^{1} = \frac{1}{2}<br />

v(t) = v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2

<br /> \int_{0}^{1} w dw = \left[ \frac{1}{2}w^2 \right]_{0}^{1} = \frac{1}{2}<br />

v(t) = v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by chroot
g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by chroot
<br /> \int_{0}^{1} x dx = \left[ \frac{1}{2}x^2 \right]_{0}^{1} = \frac{1}{2}<br />

v(t) = v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2

<br /> \int_{0}^{1} y dy = \left[ \frac{1}{2}y^2 \right]_{0}^{1} = \frac{1}{2}<br />

v(t) = v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2

<br /> \int_{0}^{1} z dz = \left[ \frac{1}{2}z^2 \right]_{0}^{1} = \frac{1}{2}<br />

v(t) = v_0 + \frac{1}{2} a t^2

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by chroot
g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

g_{\mu\nu}

 

[chroot]

Okay guys...

Keep playing with the LaTeX stuff.

At the moment, it seems like newreply.php sometimes doesn't work quite right, but I can't identify the situations where it fails just yet.

If you post a new reply and something doesn't work right, hit edit, then save, and it should be fine. I'm going to look into the problem soon.

In the meantime, practice LaTeX and let me know what you find.

- Warren

 

[selfAdjoint]

Let's see,

The third Pauli matrix is

/sigma_{3} = \left(\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;0\\0&amp;-1\end{array}\right}

 

[selfAdjoint]

Hah! Missing terminator

The third Pauli matrix is

/sigma_{3} = \left(\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;0\\0&amp;-1\end{array}\right}

 

[ahrkron]

I think you forgot a [ /tex]:

Originally posted by selfAdjoint
Let's see,

The third Pauli matrix is

\sigma_{3} = \left(\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;0\\0&amp;-1\end{array}\right)<br />

 

[selfAdjoint]

Once more

The third Pauli matrix is

\sigma_{3} = \left(\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;0\\0&amp;-1\end{array}\right}<br />

 

[selfAdjoint]

Hah! Missing terminator

The third Pauli matrix is

\sigma_{3} = \left(\begin{array}{cc}1&amp;0\\0&amp;-1\end{array}\right)

 

[selfAdjoint]

Huh, That stuff before wasn't what I entered. Let's see if this one works
<br /> g_{c}(A^{k}) = k_{s(e)}^{-1}g_{e}(A)k_{t(e)}<br />

Okay! Wahooo!

 

[ahrkron]

<br /> \begin{array}{| c | c |}1&amp;0\\0&amp;-1\end{array}<br />

<br /> \begin{array}<br /> {| c | c |}\hline 1&amp;0\\ \hline 0&amp;-1\\ \hline \end{array}<br />

 

[ahrkron]

\phi

{\color{red} \phi}

{\it Let \phi denote the angle between ...}

 

[ahrkron]

<br /> \begin{array}{|c|c|}1&amp;0\\0&amp;-1\end{array}<br />

 

[Kerrie]

uh...i am not sure what i am supposed to do?

 

[Zero]

What_sort of ^crazy stuff i_s th^is ?

 

[Monique]

Originally posted by Zero
What_sort of ^crazy stuff i_s th^is ?

Nooo!

what^{\it sort}_{\it of}crazy^{\it stuff}_{\it is}this?

 

[Phobos]

well_k^o then

This is going to take some practice.

 

[Kerrie]

i am unsure of how to use the latex script?

 

[ahrkron]

You basically just type some latex code between [ tex] and [ /tex].

It allows math symbols and notation to be displayed neatly. You just need to learn how to code in tex:

"\alpha" results in \alpha
"g_{\mu \nu} --> g_{\mu \nu}

It will be a BIG plus for the science forums at PF.

 

[ahrkron]

More trials:

<br /> \begin{array}{| c | c |}1&amp;0\\0&amp;-1\end{array}<br />

 

[ahrkron]

I'm getting the impresion that, if I get the message "Latex graphic is being generated, reload in a moment" the very first time I submit, the graphic never gets to be there... can that be the case?

There are a couple posts I made last night that are still in that state.

 

[Monique]

Originally posted by Kerrie
i am unsure of how to use the latex script?

Kerrie, look here:

http://computing.ee.ethz.ch/.soft/l...reen/ltx-2.html
https://www.physicsforums.com/misc/howtolatex.pdf

:}

 

[Monique]

Great_{\it I was}{}^{\it wondering}{}_{\it how to do}{}^{\it that!}

Great_{\it I {}was}{}^{\it wondering}{}_{\it how {}to{} do}{}^{\it that!}

 

[ahrkron]

Trying spacers:

Great_{\it I\ was}{}^{\it wondering}{}_{\it how~to~do}{}^{\it that!}

 

[enigma]

So when are we letting this go mainstream?

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by Ambitwistor
For light-gray post backgrounds, the TeX images look okay, but their borders don't look so good against the posts with dark-gray backgrounds. Is there any way to get it to antialias to different background colors depending on which post it's in?

This kind of bugs me too -- but there's no way to determine exactly what background color to antialias to. I think the best solution to it might actually be to change the default color scheme for the site -- but I don't know what to do about that yet. It would look a little prettier if the antialiasing were exactly correct, I know.

It might be nice to supplement the default installation with some extra packages and fonts, like amsmath (amsfonts, amssymb), wasysym, marvosym, etc. Maybe we could even add some forum-specific user-defined macros of our own.

amsmath, amsfonts, and amssymb are already included -- give 'em a try. As far as the others, sure -- we can add them. Let me know.

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by Ambitwistor
Improperly aligned tensor indices:

R^a_{bcd}

Properly aligned tensor indices:

R^a{}_{bcd}

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by Ambitwistor
Improperly aligned tensor indices:

R^a_{bcd}

Properly aligned tensor indices:

R^a{}_{bcd}

 

[chroot]

Ambi, you're still having the problem where new replies not working, but edits working? Hold on just a sec...

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by Ambitwistor
<br /> \overline{x} <br /> \hat{x}<br /> \check{x} <br /> \tilde{x} <br /> \acute{x} <br /> \grave{x} <br /> \dot{x} <br /> \ddot{x} <br /> \breve{x} <br /> \bar{x} <br /> \vec{x}<br /> \underline{x}<br />

<br /> A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C<br />

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by Ambitwistor
<br /> \overline{y} <br /> \hat{y}<br /> \check{y} <br /> \tilde{y} <br /> \acute{y} <br /> \grave{y} <br /> \dot{y} <br /> \ddot{y} <br /> \breve{y} <br /> \bar{y} <br /> \vec{y}<br /> \underline{y}<br />

<br /> A\yleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \yrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C<br />

 

[chroot]

<br /> \overline{y} <br /> \hat{y}<br /> \check{y} <br /> \tilde{y} <br /> \acute{y} <br /> \grave{y} <br /> \dot{y} <br /> \ddot{y} <br /> \breve{y} <br /> \bar{y} <br /> \vec{y}<br /> \underline{y}<br />

<br /> A\yleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \yrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C<br />

 

[chroot]

OMG, I'm a moron! newrepy.php should work now.

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by chroot
<br /> \overline{y} <br /> \hat{y}<br /> \check{y} <br /> \tilde{y} <br /> \acute{y} <br /> \grave{y} <br /> \dot{y} <br /> \ddot{y} <br /> \breve{y} <br /> \bar{y} <br /> \vec{y}<br /> \underline{y}<br />

<br /> A\yleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \yrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C<br />

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by Ambitwistor
Maybe overzealous on the search-and-replace on those x's, eh?

<br /> A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C<br />

Okay.. new replies should work. The post preview and topic reviews now show a better message:

LaTeX image not viewable here.

This should mean the end of the dreaded "LaTeX image being generated." message.

- Warren

 

[chroot]

This is valid latex:

<br /> <br /> \eta_{\mu\nu}<br /> <br /> <br />

This is not:

\yourmom

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Originally posted by chroot
This is valid latex:

<br /> <br /> \eta_{\mu\nu}<br /> <br /> <br />

This is not:

\yourmom

- Warren

 

[chroot]

How about non-antialiased?

<br /> A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C<br />

 

[chroot]

And now on the darker gray background...

<br /> A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C<br />

 

[chroot]

Higher resolution... maybe scaling will make it appear nice.

<br /> A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C<br /> [/B][/QUOTE]

- Warren

 

[chroot]

Let's try scaling..

<br /> A\xleftarrow{n+\mu-1}B \xrightarrow[T]{n\pm i-1}C<br />