Is Manned Space Travel More Beneficial Than Robot-Controlled Missions?

AI Thread Summary
Manned space travel is often viewed as more beneficial than robot-controlled missions due to its potential for direct human observation and interaction with the environment. Participants argue that initial robotic probes can gather essential data, allowing for better preparation before sending humans. This approach enables the development of suitable technology and training for astronauts. Furthermore, the excitement and inspiration generated by human presence in space can significantly impact scientific research and society. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of a phased approach to space exploration, starting with robotic missions to inform future manned endeavors.

What are your thoughts on space travel/exploration?

  • No. Waste of money.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, but should be limited to robotic probes.

    Votes: 2 8.7%
  • Yes, robotic probes for now, with human bases later.

    Votes: 16 69.6%
  • Yes, we should go with a human program wherever possible.

    Votes: 5 21.7%

  • Total voters
    23
FZ+
Messages
1,594
Reaction score
3
This is a continuation of the why space travel thread. Try to keep the discussion over there, ok?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
yep. i chose 3 option. find out what a place is like (probes) than create a suitable ship and suits, train people. probe with humans. then colonise.
 
An abvious choice to me: Let's ride !
 
I also chose the third option since it seems most logical...it's better to know what's out there before sending in humans...
 
indeed. it seems logical to 'research' what you are heading into. that allows you to create scenarios of the environment.. etc etc.

I'd love to just go out and have a space walk... that would be so cool, i reckon.
 
Are there any characteristics that manned-missions in space are better e.g. impact on scientific research and society, than robot-contolled missions?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top