Is Mendeleev's Table Truly Complete?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fawk3s
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complete Table
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the completeness of Mendeleev's periodic table and whether it encompasses all possible atoms in the universe. It is clarified that new atoms would require unique combinations of protons and neutrons, with their position in the table determined solely by the number of protons. Atoms with the same proton count but different neutron counts are considered the same element, occupying the same spot in the table. Gaps in the table can only occur at the right end, where new elements are occasionally discovered. The conversation also notes that while stable elements are well-documented, many heavier elements are radioactive. The laws of nature are believed to apply consistently throughout the observable universe.
fawk3s
Messages
341
Reaction score
1
Hi

This might be a pretty stupid question to you guys, but it started to bug me.

Are the elements that Mendeleev's table contains all the possible atoms that our universe contains or could there be more which we just don't know about?
And if it is complete, why arent there any more possibilities? Is it because of the size of the nucleus?

Thanks in advance,
fawk3s
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Merry Christmas!

fawk3s said:
… Are the elements that Mendeleev's table contains all the possible atoms that our universe contains or could there be more which we just don't know about?

Hi fawk3s! :smile:

A new atom would have a new combination of numbers of protons and neutrons in the nucleus.

Its place in the Mendeleev table is fixed only by the number of protons.

Two atoms with the same number of protons but different numbers of (neutral) neutrons would have the same electron shell structure, and so would be chemically the same, which is why they would be called the same element, and be in the same position in the table.

So the only place there can be gaps in the table is on the right-hand end, and indeed new elements are occasionally added there.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability" and links from it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We pretty much know all the elements that are stable. The rest are radioactive.

As far was we know, the laws of Nature apply in the visible universe as they do here.


www.webelements.com displays the periodic table and has some information on the superheavy elements.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top