Is My Chemical Equation for Fuel-Rich Ethylene Combustion Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter engineer23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemical Writing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the combustion equation for fuel-rich ethylene (C2H4) in the presence of nitrogen (N2) and ambient air. The participants clarify that the chemical equation should not include O2 or N2 in the products, focusing instead on the formation of carbon dioxide (CO2) and water vapor (H2O). The stoichiometric ratio of air to ethylene is essential, with the given ratios indicating that ethylene constitutes 1/41 of the fuel gas and oxygen is 1/5 of the air composition. The main objective is to correctly formulate the combustion equation to facilitate the calculation of the air to ethylene ratio. Accurate representation of the reactants and products is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
engineer23
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An engine is operated slightly fuel rich (phi>1). Ethylene (C2H4) and inert nitrogen (N2) are the reactants and there are 40 mol of nitrogen for every mol of ethylene. The hydrocarbons are burned over a catalyst and converted to carbon dioxide (CO2) and water vapor (H20) only. Ambient air at 298 K with a composition of 1 mol of oxygen to 4 mol of nitrogen (O2 + 4N2) is injected before the catalyst. The catalyst is maintained at 1000 K. The temperature before the injection of the catalyst is 400 K. Calculate moles of air to moles of ethylene.

Homework Equations



C2H4 + 40 N2 + (a/phi) (O2 + 4N2) --> b CO2 + c H20 (gas) + d N2, where phi is the equivalence ratio and a, b, c, and d are stoichiometric coefficients

Hr = Hp



The Attempt at a Solution



For the equation I have written in (2), should O2 be included in the products? Should N2 be included in the products? I think if I can write the equation correctly, I know how to use mass balance and Hr = Hp to solve for the stoichiometric coefficient of air.

So my major question is, is my chemical equation right? If not, how do I correct it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All you need to start is to determine the stoichiometric ratio between pure ethylene and pure oxygen. Write that equation first. Next you will determine the ratio of air (oxygen plus nitrogen) to fuel (ethylene plus nitrogen).

Your problem gives you the information that the fuel is composed of a ratio of 40 moles Nitrogen to 1 mole of ethylene... or that ethylene is 1/41 parts of the fuel gas composition. Likewise the air contains 1 mole of oxygen (as O2) to 5 moles of air (oxygen plus nitrogen) or is 1/5 parts of the air composition.

Can you take it from here?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top