Is My Clock Cycle Calculation Accurate for a 2.5 GHz CPU?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanjoJojo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clock Cycle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the clock cycle for a CPU operating at 2.5 GHz. The correct formula to determine the clock cycle in nanoseconds is established as 10^-9 seconds multiplied by the frequency in hertz, resulting in a period of 2.5 nanoseconds for a 2.5 GHz CPU. Participants emphasize the inverse relationship between frequency and period, clarifying that a higher frequency corresponds to a shorter period. The calculation is confirmed as accurate, with a reminder to include the division operation in future calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of CPU frequency and clock cycles
  • Basic knowledge of nanoseconds and their conversion
  • Familiarity with mathematical operations involving exponents
  • Concept of inverse relationships in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between CPU frequency and performance
  • Learn about clock cycle calculations for different CPU architectures
  • Explore the implications of clock speed on computational efficiency
  • Investigate tools for measuring CPU performance metrics
USEFUL FOR

Computer engineers, hardware designers, and students studying computer architecture will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in CPU performance calculations.

DanjoJojo
Messages
8
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
What is the duration of a clock cycle (in nanoseconds) for a CPU running at 2.5 GHz?
So far I have come to the understanding that a nanosecond is one billionth of a second or 10-9 seconds. So I found this formula to calculate the clock cycle in nanoseconds, for a CPU running at 2.5 GHz.

10^-9 x 2.5 x 10^9 = 2.5 nanoseconds

Am I missing any important steps with my calculation? Is this accurate?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
A 1GHz frequency would be 1ns period. A higher frequency would involve a smaller period. What formula are you using?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lomidrevo
Also, is this for schoolwork?
 
Period is inversely proportional to frequency. I don't see the 'devide' operation in your calculation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
13K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
34K
Replies
3
Views
848
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K