Is My Clock Cycle Calculation Accurate for a 2.5 GHz CPU?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanjoJojo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clock Cycle
Click For Summary
A nanosecond is defined as one billionth of a second, or 10^-9 seconds. The calculation for determining the clock cycle in nanoseconds for a CPU running at 2.5 GHz is accurately represented as 10^-9 seconds multiplied by 2.5 x 10^9, resulting in a period of 2.5 nanoseconds. The discussion emphasizes that a 1 GHz frequency corresponds to a 1 ns period, and higher frequencies yield shorter periods. It highlights the importance of understanding that the period is inversely proportional to frequency. Some participants noted the absence of a division operation in the original calculation, suggesting a need for clarity in the formula used.
DanjoJojo
Messages
8
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
What is the duration of a clock cycle (in nanoseconds) for a CPU running at 2.5 GHz?
So far I have come to the understanding that a nanosecond is one billionth of a second or 10-9 seconds. So I found this formula to calculate the clock cycle in nanoseconds, for a CPU running at 2.5 GHz.

10^-9 x 2.5 x 10^9 = 2.5 nanoseconds

Am I missing any important steps with my calculation? Is this accurate?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
A 1GHz frequency would be 1ns period. A higher frequency would involve a smaller period. What formula are you using?
 
Also, is this for schoolwork?
 
Period is inversely proportional to frequency. I don't see the 'devide' operation in your calculation.
 
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
13K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
34K
Replies
3
Views
808
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K