Is My Coulomb's Law Calculation Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ForrestFire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb's law Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of Coulomb's Law to calculate the distance of a third particle in relation to two other charges. The user consistently arrives at a distance of 15.47 cm but feels uncertain about their calculations. They set up equations based on Coulomb's Law and canceled out constants, but suspect they may have made an error. Other participants suggest visualizing the problem by drawing a diagram and carefully labeling the forces acting on the third charge. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the direction of forces acting on the charge for accurate calculations.
ForrestFire
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://i.imgur.com/ITrJq.png

Homework Equations



F=kq1q2/r^2 (Coulomb's Law)

The Attempt at a Solution

Whenever I try to get the answer, I keep coming up with 15.47cm.

I found the Coulomb's law for the third particle in relation to the other two, then set those equations to each other. This let me cancel out k and the charge of the third particle, since it wasn't given in the first place. After that it was a simple algebraic solve to find the distance.

But I feel like I'm missing something big, so I'm here for some assistance.

Thanks so much ahead of time! You guys have saved me before. It's only worth one point, which is basically nothing, but I really need to know how to do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I tried the problem, thought I had it but made a simple error, one you might be making. If you draw a picture, you might think why bother, and carefully label the forces on the third charge at some point x between the charges you might get it. Note that the forces on the third charge either both act to the left or both act to the right.

Good luck!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top