Is my expeirmental procedure sound?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WK95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Procedure Sound
AI Thread Summary
The experimental procedure aims to determine the percentage composition of H2O2 in an unknown solution by measuring the volume of oxygen produced during its decomposition. The setup involves a test tube containing the H2O2 solution and an enzyme, connected to a flask filled with water, which allows for pressure changes to facilitate measurement. The process relies on stoichiometry to relate the volume of O2 produced to the initial amount of H2O2. Key considerations include the effects of partial pressure of water and external pressure on the results. The poster confirmed the procedure's validity with their TA, indicating that the apparatus design is sound.
WK95
Messages
139
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Using the apparatus that I've drawn, I have to deteremine the % composition H2O2 in an unknown solution.


2. Relevant information
H2O2 (aq) -enzyme-> H2O(l) + O2(g)
or
2H2O2 -Enzyme-> 2H2O(l) + O2(g) when balanced
The test tube (1) contains H2O2 solution with an enzyme attached to a rxn. rod that will be lowered to start the rxn. The test tube is connected via tubing to a flask. The flask (2) is nearly filled with water. That flaks is connected via tubing to a beaker which has enough water to cover the tube's tip.

As far as I understand, the rxn. catalyzed by the enzyme results in the above rxn. occurring. The rxn. in the testube produces O2 (g) which goes to the flask via tubing which forces H2O levels down due to pressure. This in turn forces H2O through the right side tubing and into the beaker (3).

Of course, the process is simplified a bit.

% by weight (mass) of element = (total mass of element present ÷ molecular mass) x 100

The Attempt at a Solution


i've already completed a laboratory exercise where I computed Pressure due to O2, Volume of O2 at STP, grams O2, moles O2, Molar Volume of O2 at STP.

Using the unknown solution, I can repeat the steps for the first part of the experiment in which I determined the above values.

I'm thinking that given an unknown solution of H2O2, I could put enough enzyme so that all the H2O2 has fully decomposed. By measuring the O2 produced, I can use stoichiometry to find the amount of H2O2 originally then using molar mass, calculate how much H2O2 there originally was. Using stiochiometry, I can calculate the amount of H2O producedby the rxn. and subtract this value from the volume of H2O in the test tube will give me the amount of H2O originally in the solution.

Thus, to get % comp, I divided mass of H2O2 by mass of H2O2+mass of H2O x 100 to get % compositon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hard to say anything not seeing the image. You have not mentioned partial pressure of water, you have not mentioned external pressure, you have not mentioned pressure exerted by the column of water present to list the most obvious things. Some of these can be eliminated by a good design of the apparatus, some can't.
 
Thanks for the reply but I no longer need this thread as I was able to confirm from my TA that the procedure works with the apparatus. It was ore detailed there.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top