I wouldn't worry about it. You can always teach yourself various error propagation methods, as needed. Concentrate on learning the physics.madah12 said:So is this Gaussian error propagation something optional because they do the uncertainties in different ways which I didn't understand.
The criteria for determining if a physics course is following acceptable standards include:
To ensure that a physics course is up-to-date with current scientific advancements, it is important for the instructor to stay informed about new research and developments in the field. This can be done by attending conferences and workshops, networking with other scientists, and regularly reviewing and updating course materials.
While it may not be necessary for all physics courses to have a laboratory component, it is generally recommended for courses to have some form of hands-on experimentation to reinforce theoretical concepts and develop scientific skills. This can also help students better understand the practical applications of physics in the real world.
An instructor teaching a physics course should have a strong background in physics, typically with a graduate degree in the field. They should also have experience teaching at the appropriate level and be knowledgeable about current pedagogical practices. Additionally, having research experience or involvement in the scientific community can also be beneficial.
If you have concerns about the quality of your physics course, it is important to communicate your feedback to the instructor or department responsible for the course. This can be done through direct communication, such as email or in-person meetings, or through course evaluations. Your feedback can help improve the course for future students.