Is My Solution to Problem 2 in Electrodynamics Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maybe_Memorie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrodynamics
Maybe_Memorie
Messages
346
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'd type this out but there's a bit too much formulae.
http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~tristan/MA3431/Homework_1.pdf

It's problem 2. I'm just wondering if my solution is correct.

Thanks in advance!

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



In this problem I'm taking Ro = |xo - x'|

The volume in question is charge-free so the charge density, ρ(x'), is zero so the first term on the right hand side of the potential vanishes.

Also, ∂/∂n(1/Ro) = -1/R2o

Substituting this into the potential function gives the required result.


For the second part of 2 we use the divergence theorem (which I won't state here due to my lack of latex skills) as told.

We know that ∂\Phi/∂n = ∇\Phi.n and from the definition of the electric field E we end up with -E.n.

When this is used in the divergence theorem we end up with the volume integral of ∇.E which is equal to ρ/ε which vanishes in a charge free volume.

We now have the required expression.


(Haven't gotten to part 3 yet, will be posted soon.)

I know I haven't explained everything in a great way, but it's a lot easier on paper than it is online to write out loads of partials and surface integrals.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe_Memorie said:

Homework Statement



I'd type this out but there's a bit too much formulae.
http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~tristan/MA3431/Homework_1.pdf

It's problem 2. I'm just wondering if my solution is correct.

Thanks in advance!

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



In this problem I'm taking Ro = |xo - x'|

The volume in question is charge-free so the charge density, ρ(x'), is zero so the first term on the right hand side of the potential vanishes.

Also, ∂/∂n(1/Ro) = -1/R2o
Perhaps it was just a typo, but the lefthand side should be written
$$\left.\frac{\partial}{\partial n}\left(\frac{1}{R}\right)\right|_{R=R_0}.$$ The way you wrote it, you're differentiating the constant 1/R0, so the lefthand side would be equal to 0.

Other than that, what you've done sounds fine.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top