Is Our Galaxy Destined to Merge with the Great Attractor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the gravitational pull of the Great Attractor on our galaxy, with the premise that if gravity travels at the speed of light, our galaxy is being drawn towards a position the Great Attractor occupied in the past. The conversation highlights that the galaxy's trajectory is likely curved, which suggests it may eventually intersect with the Great Attractor's path, leading to a potential merger. The analogy of a protostellar disk is used to illustrate how galaxies approach each other in spiraled paths rather than direct lines. The merging process is expected to unfold over billions of years, similar to other galactic interactions in the universe. Overall, the complexities of gravitational dynamics at this scale indicate that while merging is possible, it will take an immense amount of time.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
i have read that our galaxy is being pulled towards
the great attractor, also that the speed of gravity
is equal to C, if both of the above are correct then
our galaxy is being pulled to a position that the
great attractor was in the past, i don't know how far
away the GA is but for dscusion purposes only say
it is 100LYs, that would mean that our galaxy is
being pulled to a position occupied by the GA 100
years in the past, now if i suggest that the GA is
mooving at a right angle to the line of travel our galaxy then they
could never merge.
why is my thinking wrong?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Under your assumption our galaxy would be moving in a curved path, which would eventually hit the direction vector of the great attractor and pointing toward it. Whether it merges at that time or later depends on how fast the great attractor is moving relative to our galaxy.
 
Originally posted by mathman
Under your assumption our galaxy would be moving in a curved path, which would eventually hit the direction vector of the great attractor and pointing toward it. Whether it merges at that time or later depends on how fast the great attractor is moving relative to our galaxy.
Yes, it is just like the gravitational effect on any "merging" system of multiple bodies. The fact that is on a >galactic scale is no more or less than on a much smaller scale.

Just think of it like the familiar "protostellar disk" forming a star and planets. The attraction does not pull all the material directly to a single center of mass in a straight line. The material (galaxies in this case) will approach on vectored (curved) paths and spiral closer and closer as they get nearer. Some galaxies may directly merge by chance collision, but most will spiral in with increasing V until they are close enough to collide and/or merge into a large, fat biggie. On this scale, we are probably talking billions of years and maybe even more than the present age of the universe. This is for our large-local group. The same thing is going on in other huge areas of the universe.

Labguy.
 
now all is clear thanks
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top