Is Our Universe Really Flat or is it Just Euclidean Jargon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mtv22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flat Universe
AI Thread Summary
The term "flat" in cosmology refers to a universe that is asymptotically Euclidean, meaning it behaves like a flat, rectilinear grid in higher dimensions rather than being two-dimensional. This concept can be confusing, as "flat" implies the absence of curvature, which has a specific definition in physics. The universe is considered either infinitely flat or pringle-shaped flat, but this does not mean it is two-dimensional. Clarifying this terminology could enhance understanding in discussions about the shape of the universe. Overall, the use of "flat" is a jargon that requires careful explanation to avoid misconceptions.
mtv22
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I read that most scientists believe that the Universe is either infinitely flat or pringle-shaped flat, and that doesn't make sense with me. I don't understand how our 3 dimensional world could be a part of a 2 dimensional universe.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi mtv22, welcome to physics forums!
That's not what is meant by 'flat'---they're using the term to describe higher dimensions (namely 3+1 space-time).

For the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe" flat means asymptotically euclidean. Instead of having intrinsic curvature, the universe would be a perfectly flat, rectilinear grid (like you use in Cartesian geometry), where the interior angles of triangles add to 180 degrees, etc etc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A lot of people ask this, and it's confusing because it's not always made clear that the term "flat" is jargon for "Euclidean." Granted, they call it flat because it implies the absence of "curvature", but the term curvature itself is something that has a very specific definition. Either way, it does not mean two-dimensional! We should probably add something about this to the Cosmology FAQ.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top