Is P(x + a > y + b) Always 0.5 for Independent Variables?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Schlotkins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability Proof
Schlotkins
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Good evening:

I have a probability proof question that is driving me crazy. I feel
like I must have forgot an easy trick. Any help is GREATLY
appreciated. Here's the setup:

Let's assume a,b are indepedent random variables from cummulative
distribution F.


I think it's safe to say:


P( a > b) = .5


Now, let's assume x,y are independent random variables from CDF G.
Again:


P(x > y) = 0.5


Assume CDFs G and F are indepedent. Now it seems straightforward that:


P(x + a > y + b) = 0.5


but I don't know how to show it without assuming a distribution type.


Again, any help is appreciated.


Thank you,
Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are familiar with characteristic functions it is simple.
Let f and g be the characteristic functions of F and G.
Then S= x - y + a - b will have a ch. fcn. f(t)f(-t)g(t)g(-t).
This means that S has a symmetric distribution.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the tip and the response - I think I have it solved. On an aside, that trick wouldn't work for P(ax < by) right? It seems obvious that the P(ax - by < 0 ) = P (by - ax < 0)= .5, but of course characteristic functions are most useful for sums.

Thanks again for your assistance.
Chris
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top