Is Phi^3 Theory in Five Dimensions Supposed to Be Finite?

  • Thread starter Thread starter electroweak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions Theory
electroweak
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
OK, I think I am missing something very basic...

When regularizing phi^3 theory in six dimensions, Srednicki comes to eq 14.30, which shows that the 1-loop contribution to the propagator diverges (the gamma function has a pole). This is good.

OK. Now let d=5 (or epsilon=1). Actually, go ahead and let d=1001 or any odd number. Then 14.30 is finite, which definitely seems wrong. "Superficially," the diagram should diverge...

What am I screwing up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question would be easier to answer if you actually told us what's in equation 14.3.
 
@dauto, how is 14.3 going to help resolve equation 14.30?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top