Is Phi^3 Theory in Five Dimensions Supposed to Be Finite?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter electroweak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions Theory
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
electroweak
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
OK, I think I am missing something very basic...

When regularizing phi^3 theory in six dimensions, Srednicki comes to eq 14.30, which shows that the 1-loop contribution to the propagator diverges (the gamma function has a pole). This is good.

OK. Now let d=5 (or epsilon=1). Actually, go ahead and let d=1001 or any odd number. Then 14.30 is finite, which definitely seems wrong. "Superficially," the diagram should diverge...

What am I screwing up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question would be easier to answer if you actually told us what's in equation 14.3.
 
@dauto, how is 14.3 going to help resolve equation 14.30?