Is Physics Forums truly beloved by nuclear engineers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter atyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interim report mentioned in an article by The Economist, highlighting concerns that it may not receive adequate attention. The report has gained traction on Physics Forums, a platform popular among nuclear engineers. Participants question how The Economist verified its claim that the forum is "beloved of nuclear engineers." Suggestions for verification methods include web searches and direct inquiries to forum administrators or members. There is speculation that the journalist may have independently discovered the forum before reaching out to its community for insights. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for the interim report to be recognized and the methods of validation used by media sources.
atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,379
"For now, the risk is that the interim report does not get the attention it deserves. So far it seems to have aroused more interest on a techie website called Physics Forums, beloved of nuclear engineers" http://www.economist.com/node/21542437

True or false? How could The Economist have verified "beloved of nuclear engineers"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
atyy said:
"For now, the risk is that the interim report does not get the attention it deserves. So far it seems to have aroused more interest on a techie website called Physics Forums, beloved of nuclear engineers" http://www.economist.com/node/21542437

True or false? How could The Economist have verified "beloved of nuclear engineers"?
That's not a true or false question. You ask how. My guess is via web (Google, Yahoo, etc.) searches and then making their assessment based on reading certain threads. What thread or threads might they be referring to?
 
Last edited:
atyy said:
True or false? How could The Economist have verified "beloved of nuclear engineers"?
They probably called PF Administrator, Astronuc, a nuclear engineer, and asked him.
 
Yeah, I am pretty sure it's that guy with the beard which did it.
 
I don't think they called him (he would have told us), but awesome either way.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top