Is Point P in Young's Double Slit Experiment the Center of the Central Minimum?

AI Thread Summary
In Young's Double Slit Experiment, when light rays strike the slits at an angle θ = sin^(-1)(λ/2d), Point P on the screen is identified as the center of the central minimum due to destructive interference. The necessary condition for minima is that the path difference Δx equals nλ/2, leading to a phase difference of π between the waves from the two slits. The angle θ must be measured with respect to the normal to the plane of the slits for Point P to be on the central minimum. This results in the path length from the source to the furthest slit being 0.5λ longer than to the nearest slit, causing the waves to be out of phase. Thus, the superposition of these waves at Point P leads to destructive interference, confirming its position as the center of the central minimum.
pardesi
Messages
337
Reaction score
0
Q.Suppose that the the light rays in young's Double Slit experiment fall at an angle \theta=\sin^{-1}(\frac{\lambda}{2d}) .Then prove that the the Point P which is the symmetric point on screen between two slits is the centre of central minimum

Necessary Formulaes
for minima the waves should interfere destructively so the path difference \Delta x=\frac{n\lambda}{2}


ATTEMPT
i am not so sure of this but we can have a plane \pi,\pi^{'} with inclination \theta to the plane of slits and through the slits.the \perp distance of the Point P from the plane determines it's phase so the phase difference is difference between the length of perpendiculars from P to the planes =d \sin \theta=\frac{\lambda}{2} which produces destructive interference.

Doubt
My doubt lies on the fact that how do we apply difference in optical lengths concept here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When a plane wave front falls on the slits with an inclination theta,such that it satisfies the condition given in the problem, light coming from the two slits are not in phase. There phase difference is pi, i.e. they are out of phase. When the light from these two slits reach point P, even though they are equidistant from the point P, they produce distructive interference. So there is no need to apply difference in optical length concept.
 
Last edited:
why are they out of phase even though the distance is the same
 
What a confusingly worded question!

θ could be the angle between the incident rays and either a) the plane of the slits or b) the normal to the plane of the slits. It has to be b) for P to be on the central mimimum.

This leads to the path length from the source to the furthest slit being 0.5λ longer than to the nearest slit.

Using this information you can calculate the directions of the maxima and the minima applying the difference in optical lengths concept.
 
In this question a parallel beam of light is illuminating the slits and the plane wave front, which is perpendicular to the parallel beam, makes an angle θ with the plane of the slits.This leads to the path length from the source to the furthest slit being 0.5λ longer than to the nearest slit. So the waves coming from the two slits are not in phase but out of phase. When these waves superimpose at a point P equidistance from the two slits produce distructive interference.
 
thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top