Is Reactance the Magnitude of Impedance or Its Complex Part?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JesseC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactance
AI Thread Summary
Reactance is often confused with the magnitude of impedance, but it specifically refers to the imaginary part of impedance, represented as |Y| in some contexts. The correct formula for the magnitude of impedance is |Z| = √(R² + X²), where R is resistance and X is reactance. The discussion also touches on the notation used, clarifying that Z can be expressed as a complex number Z = X + Yj, where X is resistance and Y is reactance. Additionally, the phase of a perfect inductor or capacitor is indeed ±π/2, as R equals zero in these cases, leading to arctan(±∞). This highlights the importance of understanding the distinctions between these electrical concepts.
JesseC
Messages
247
Reaction score
2
My notes say reactance is the magnitude of impedance, so I assume it means this:

|Z| = \sqrt{X^2 + Y^2}

but this is contradicted by numerous internet sources I've read which say that it is the magnitude of the complex part of impedance |Y| . Could someone clarify this?

I'm more inclined to trust the internet given my lecturer is an Astronomer :P
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
JesseC said:
My notes say reactance is the magnitude of impedance, so I assume it means this:

|Z| = \sqrt{X^2 + Y^2}

but this is contradicted by numerous internet sources I've read which say that it is the magnitude of the complex part of impedance |Y| . Could someone clarify this?

I'm more inclined to trust the internet given my lecturer is an Astronomer :P

The following is the correct form. R is resistance, & X is reactance. BTW, "Y" is admittance, the reciprocal of impedance. Did I help?

|Z| = \sqrt{R^2 + X^2}

Claude
 
Last edited:
Yeah sorry, I've used confusing notation such that Z being a complex number was of the form Z = X+Yj. So the real part X is resistance, and the imaginary part Y is reactance. Clearly modulus of Z is something else altogether, what would its use be?

I have another question while I'm here: Is the phase of a perfect inductor or capacitor always +π/2 or -π/2?

Given that (using your notation) phase is arctan(X/R) and for a capacitor or inductor R = 0, then ±π/2 = arctan(±∞). I never trust myself when it comes to things involving circuits.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Back
Top