Is s_m the Same as s_n in Advanced Calculus Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mynameisfunk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the sequences s_m and s_n in the context of an advanced calculus problem, specifically addressing whether these sequences are considered the same and the implications of that for part (a) of the assignment.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between s_m and s_n, questioning if they represent the same sequence. Some express confusion regarding the implications of this for the limit superior of the sequences.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the definitions and properties of limit superior, while others have acknowledged misunderstandings in their initial readings of the problem. There is an ongoing exploration of examples to clarify the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of misinterpretations regarding the sequence indices and the conditions under which the sequences are evaluated. Participants are also discussing the notation and its representation in LaTeX.

mynameisfunk
Messages
122
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See attachment

I am confused by what they mean on part (a) are these sequences s_m and s_n the same sequence and this is what i should be showing?
 

Attachments

  • HW6Q3.jpg
    HW6Q3.jpg
    28.3 KB · Views: 479
Physics news on Phys.org
Edit: Misread the question.
 
Last edited:
wouldnt that make (a) false then? but a goes to infinity... truncated on infinity?
 
Misread the question. Thought it said m < n... Sorry.
 
also, if someone could show me show to write part a in LateX i would appreciate it
 
I don't know the answer to the question but I can show you the latex.

\mathop {\lim \sup }\limits_{n \to \infty}} s_n = \mathop {\lim}\limits_{n \to \infty}} \left( \sup \lbrace s_m | m \geq n \rbrace \right)

Code:
 \mathop {\lim \sup }\limits_{n \to \infty}} s_n = \mathop {\lim}\limits_{n \to \infty}} \left( \sup \lbrace s_m | m \geq n \rbrace  \right)
 
with the inequality m \leq n
 
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty}} \mathop {\sup }\limits_{m \geq n}} s_m

Code:
\mathop {\lim  }\limits_{n \to \infty}} \mathop {\sup }\limits_{m \geq n}} s_m
 
Yes, s_n and s_m refer to the same sequence, just numbered differently.

As for \lim_{n\to\infty} sup s_n= \lim_{n\to\infty}\{sup s_m|m\ge n\}
look at some simple examples. if n= 1, then \{s_m|m\ge 1\} is just the sequence itself. If n= 2, then \{s_m|m\ge 2\} is all terms of the sequence except the first. In general, \{s_m|m\ge n\} is the set of all terms of the sequence except those before s_n. "\{sup s_n|m\ge 1\} is the supremum (greatest lower bound) of all terms in the sequence beyond a certain point.

In a special case, suppose \{a_n\} converges to A. Then, given \epsilon&gt; 0 there exist N such that if n> N, |a_n- A|&lt; \epsilon so there are no members of the sequence, beyond n= N, that are larger than A+ \epsilon and it is easy to see that, as n goes to infinity, the supremums of \{s_n|m\ge n\} must go to A.

Suppose the sequence has a subsequence that converges to A and a subsequence that converges to B. Then no matter how large n is, there exist numbers in the sequence beyond n that are close to A and numbers close to B. The supremum will be close to whichever of A or B is larger. In the limit, the supremum will be the larger of A and B.

In general lim sup is the supremum of the set of all sub-sequential limits of the sequence. That is, you determine all numbers to which sub-sequences converge and find their supremum.
 
  • #10
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K