Is Second Hand Smoke Harmful Even If It Doesn't Cause Failed Urine Tests?

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jasongreat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effects hand Smoke
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the health implications of secondhand smoke, particularly focusing on whether it can lead to failed urine tests for marijuana and the general dangers associated with exposure to secondhand cigarette smoke. The scope includes health risks, toxicology, and the effects of dosage from secondhand exposure.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that secondhand smoke is similar to direct inhalation in terms of exposure to harmful combustion products, with differences primarily in the depth of inhalation and frequency of exposure.
  • One participant suggests that the dosage of psychoactive compounds from secondhand marijuana smoke is likely insufficient to cause a positive urine test, contrasting this with the chronic health risks associated with carcinogenic substances in tobacco smoke.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the conflicting information about the effects of secondhand smoke and its potential to cause failed urine tests, seeking clarification on the efficiency of toxin transfer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the health risks of secondhand smoke and its potential to cause positive urine tests, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights uncertainties regarding the dosage required for psychoactive effects and the chronic health risks associated with secondhand smoke exposure, as well as the varying interpretations of how toxins are transferred through secondhand smoke.

Jasongreat
I have a question regarding second hand smoke and its dangers, I hope this is the right place to post it.

I have been told how dangerous second hand cigarette smoke is, I have also been told that it is impossible to fail a urine test due to inhaling second hand MJ smoke. So which is it, second hand smoke is an efficient way to transfer toxins from one to another, or toxins can't be efficiently transported via second hand smoke? Or are there other reasons that I am overlooking why this is supposedly so?

Thanks for any help.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
There's really no difference between second hand smoke and being the primary inhaler, other than possibly how deeply the smoke is inhaled into your lungs (the primary smoker might take a much deeper breath to "enjoy" the smoke than the person exposed to second hand smoke who is trying to breathe more shallowly to avoid inhaling as much as possible). You're inhaling the combustion products, whether intentionally or secondarily. The only real difference is that the primary smoker would be exposed frequently, while the person exposed to secondary smoke might be getting a lighter dose over time from less frequent exposure...unless they are sharing a home with a smoker.
 
Moonbear said:
There's really no difference between second hand smoke and being the primary inhaler, other than possibly how deeply the smoke is inhaled into your lungs (the primary smoker might take a much deeper breath to "enjoy" the smoke than the person exposed to second hand smoke who is trying to breathe more shallowly to avoid inhaling as much as possible). You're inhaling the combustion products, whether intentionally or secondarily. The only real difference is that the primary smoker would be exposed frequently, while the person exposed to secondary smoke might be getting a lighter dose over time from less frequent exposure...unless they are sharing a home with a smoker.

Thanks, Moonbear. It seems I have been told wrongly, second hand MJ smoke could cause one to fail a urinalysis, I couldn't see how it could work in one case and not the other and I knew one of the fine members here would set it straight.
 
The issue here is probably dosage. For getting high from marijuana and having enough to test positive for the substance, you need a large dose of the psychoactive compounds in the smoke, which the second hand smoke probably would not be able to provide in most cases. In contrast, the health concerns with tobacco and marijuana come from exposure to the carcinogenic substances in the smoke which can have harmful effects even at low doses is the exposure is chronic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
40K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K