Is Space Really Falling Faster Than Light Near a Black Hole?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jobyts
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    article Blackhole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the claim that space falls faster than light near a black hole, which is deemed incorrect and almost meaningless. The article references Andrew J. S. Hamilton's river model, comparing black holes to waterfalls, suggesting that once past the event horizon, one would fall toward the singularity faster than light. However, this assertion lacks a solid theoretical basis, as the nature of space and time inside a black hole remains unknown. The analogy of a waterfall is criticized for its inaccuracy in representing the complexities of black hole physics. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity when discussing the behavior of space near black holes.
jobyts
Messages
226
Reaction score
60
http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/04/27/falling.into.black.hole/index.html

In this article, in couple of places they mention about space moving faster than light. It's incorrect, right?


(from the article)
.
.
.
.
Hamilton also described them as places where space is falling faster than light.
.
.
.
Once you pass the horizon -- or go over Niagara Falls, in the waterfall analogy -- you would be falling faster than the speed of light toward the black hole's center -- called a singularity -- and feeling the effects, Hamilton said.
.
.
.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
space is falling faster than light
This assertion is almost meaningless. What is meant by "space falling"?

you would be falling faster than the speed of light toward the black hole's center

No one knows what happens inside a black hole - the assertion has no basis in any theory.
 
The article appears to be referring to Hamilton's river model-

'The river model of black holes'
Andrew J. S. Hamilton, Jason P. Lisle
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0411060
 
"I think of a black hole as rather like a waterfall, except it's not a fall of water but rather a fall of space... Once you pass the horizon -- or go over Niagara Falls, in the waterfall analogy -- you would be falling faster than the speed of light toward the black hole's center -- called a singularity -- and feeling the effects,” Hamilton said.
mathman said:
This assertion is almost meaningless. What is meant by "space falling"?

The relative size and state and dimension of Niagara Black Hole Mass Falls is grossly inaccurate.
Place an electromagnetic barrier out from across lip of Niagara Falls.
matter.earth

“Mass sucks” is tighter fit.
Consider poor rubber ducky lost down black hole drain in verse fluent vortex.
The speed of vortex by black hole drain exceeds even speed by ducky waves.

Peace
ron

Please forgive.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Back
Top