Is Spacetime Flat? Answers to Orbit Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quds Akbar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flat Spacetime
AI Thread Summary
Spacetime is not flat; it has curvature, which is essential for understanding gravity and orbits. If spacetime were completely flat, the universe would be in a steady state and empty, which contradicts current observations. While 3D slices of spacetime appear roughly flat, the overall structure is more complex. Misleading two-dimensional analogies often oversimplify these concepts, and Minkowski space represents flat spacetime in special relativity, not a multiverse. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately visualizing spacetime to grasp its true nature.
Quds Akbar
Messages
124
Reaction score
6
Is space-time flat and if the answer is yes then how can objects orbit vertically and diagonally(since gravity is the warping of space-time)? Or does it exist from all sides?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Spacetime is not flat.
 
Space-time itself is not flat. If it were totally flat, the universe would be in a steady state, (well, if it were totally flat everywhere, it would also have to be empty) which it is not. The 3-D slices of space-time, which we call "space" is roughly flat as far as we can tell. This is the statement that the curvature parameter found in the FLRW metric is roughly 0.
 
Spacetime is definitely not flat. The two dimensional analogies you might see on television and on documentaries are misleading.

The two dimensional visual representation is this:
geodetic.jpg


So just try picturing it better like this, instead:
illus_3dspace1.jpg
 
Space-time isn't flat,
If spacetime is absolutely flat, then if you were to set off in a rocket ship and travel in a single direction, you would eventually get to the universe that's just like the one you're in now, but where you got up an hour later this morning, or where Michael Jackson is still alive. And if you continued on this journey, eventually you would start getting to the other universes with basic physical laws, the other universes of the multiverse. What I believe is It's close to Flat, But not absolute flat

3D of Space Combine with 1D of Time to Form Malinowski space
200px-World_line.svg.png


Einstein in his book talked about this, Should read it..
 
CaptCoonoor said:
Space-time isn't flat,
If spacetime is absolutely flat, then if you were to set off in a rocket ship and travel in a single direction, you would eventually get to the universe that's just like the one you're in now, but where you got up an hour later this morning, or where Michael Jackson is still alive. And if you continued on this journey, eventually you would start getting to the other universes with basic physical laws, the other universes of the multiverse. What I believe is It's close to Flat, But not absolute flat

3D of Space Combine with 1D of Time to Form Malinowski space
200px-World_line.svg.png


Einstein in his book talked about this, Should read it..

What? I don't think Einstein talked about multiple universes to which you could travel if space-time is flat...
 
CaptCoonoor said:
3D of Space Combine with 1D of Time to Form Minkowski space

You've misunderstood what you read. Minkowski space is the flat uncurved spacetime of special relativity.
 
Matterwave said:
What? I don't think Einstein talked about multiple universes to which you could travel if space-time is flat...
I meant he talked abut Minkowsi space and lorentz transformation
 
What is the book called?
 
  • #11
We visualize space-time in a two dimensional (flat) image, because it's easier to understand that way.
If you stack an infinite amount of those two dimensional space-time fabrics above and below one another, like stacking plates; then you have what would be the the space-time we have around us.
 
  • #12
You may wish to search the forum for similar questions. This one has been answered more than once.
 
  • #13
This one is for Phinds:
teaching_physics.png
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
  • #14
Lamdbaenergy said:
illus_3dspace1.jpg
Cool graphic, but isn't it curved the wrong way? Does the purple object have negative mass?
 
Back
Top