Is spacetime truly flat without gravitational influences?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr. Paradox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flat Spacetime
AI Thread Summary
Removing all gravitational influences from a portion of space would theoretically result in flat spacetime, but complete removal of gravity is impossible due to its inherent nature. Gravitational effects are always present, as gravity has no bounds and is tied to mass. The discussion highlights the limitations of idealized Minkowski spacetime, which serves as a tangent to the more complex pseudo-Riemannian manifold. Additionally, the concept of mass in Minkowski spacetime is complicated by the universe's finite size and the reach of matter and light. Overall, the nature of spacetime remains intrinsically linked to gravitational influences.
Mr. Paradox
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
If someone were to remove all of the gravitational influences on a portion of space would that essentially make that portion of spacetime flat? (Just curious):-p
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Yes it would be flat. However it is impossible to remove all influence of gravity because gravity has no bounds.
 
Well of couse i am speaking in theoretical terms
 
Always curvature, and always mass. In other words, both sides of Einstein eq. The cover of MTW is wrong also. Idealized Minkowski manifold is a tangent space to pseudo Reimannian manifold. Also try to define mass in Minkowski spacetime manifold; some modes are at infiniity.
 
Mr. Paradox said:
If someone were to remove all of the gravitational influences on a portion of space would that essentially make that portion of spacetime flat? (Just curious):-p

Even though you can imagine and even work with the Minkowski space-time, it is limited by the size of the universe which is finite. It occupies the space of about R=c*T where c is the light speed and T is the time since the big bang. there is no sense to speak of space where the matter or light has not reached yet.

Bob.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top