Is Squaring the Momentum Operator the Same as Applying it Twice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sylvia Else
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
Sylvia Else
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I'm, slowly, working through "Quantum Physics" by Stephen Gasiorowicz, second edition. On page 49, he gives the equation

i\hbar\frac{\partial ψ(x, t)}{\partial t} = -\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}\frac{\partial ^{2}ψ(x, t)}{\partial x^2}

He then makes the identification (h/i)(\partial/\partial x) = p_{op}, which he has previously identified as the momentum operator, and rewrites the equation as

i\hbar\frac{\partial ψ(x, t)}{\partial t} = \frac{p^2_{op}}{2m}ψ(x, t)

Then he observes that the operator on the right (which I construe to mean p^2_{op}/2m) is just the energy for a free particle. And that's where I get confused. As I understand it, the square of the momentum divided by twice the mass gives the energy, but p^2_{op} isn't saying use the momentum squared, but apply the momentum operator twice.

What am I missing here?

Sylvia.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider a state with a definite value of momentum. In QM, this means a state that is an eigenstate of the momentum operator. For example, a state ##\psi(x)## satisfying

##\hat{p} \psi(x) = k \psi(x)##

(where ##\hat{p}## is the momentum operator) has a momentum of ##k##. Suppose we apply the momentum operator twice:

##\hat{p}^2 \psi(x) = \hat{p} \hat{p} \psi(x) = \hat{p} (k \psi(x)) = k \hat{p} \psi(x) = k^2 \psi(x)##.

So an eigenstate of the operator ##\hat{p}## with eigenvalue ##k## is an eigenstate of the operator ##\hat{p}^2## with eigenvalue ##k^2##. The point is that applying the operator twice gives us exactly what we want: it squares the eigenvalue. We can legitimately think of the operator ##\hat{p}^2## as the "momentum-squared" operator.
 
OK, I can follow that, thanks. He starts discussing eigenfunctions and eigentvalues a bit later. Perhaps readers are meant to take it on trust until then.

Sylvia.
 
The mathematical operation of <squaring> a linear operator means <applying it twice>:

\hat{p}^2 := \hat{p}\circ\hat{p}

(For simplicity, let's neglect hat the momentum operator is unbounded).
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top