Is SR an approximation or a special case?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vorde
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximation Sr
Vorde
Messages
786
Reaction score
0
I was having this debate with a friend, and I wanted to know if I was correct. My friend was saying that SR is an approximation for GR (albeit a very good one) with the specific conditions of only inertial reference frames, and I was saying that SR is exactly accurate with GR, and so is directly solvable from GR with those conditions made (doesn't matter if you can actually reduce GR mathematically to SR, just that logically you can).

Am I right?

Edit: I guess I can appendix this with another related question: can you mathematically reduce GR to SR?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vorde said:
I was having this debate with a friend, and I wanted to know if I was correct. My friend was saying that SR is an approximation for GR (albeit a very good one) with the specific conditions of only inertial reference frames, and I was saying that SR is exactly accurate with GR, and so is directly solvable from GR with those conditions made (doesn't matter if you can actually reduce GR mathematically to SR, just that logically you can).

Am I right?

Edit: I guess I can appendix this with another related question: can you mathematically reduce GR to SR?
Actually, the answer to the question in the title is that both are correct. In a region of spacetime small enough to neglect tidal effects SR is a good approximation to GR. SR is also a special case of GR, specifically a solution to the EFE with no stress energy anywhere.

However, it seems like you may be under the mistaken impression that SR is restricted to inertial frames only. That is not the case. You can analyze accelerated motion or use non-inertial frames in SR just fine. All that you cannot do in SR is treat gravity. See:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/acceleration.html
 
Last edited:
SR is just the case of a flat space-time. Or put mathematically, the curvature of space is zero.

It is just as exact as general relativity, but like DaleSpam said locally a curved space can be approximated by a flat one. Think of tangent planes to curved surfaces.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top